International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s Supreme Court issues notices against Cairn UK


India’s Supreme Court today issued notices on a special leave petition filed by Cairn UK against an adverse decision from the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR).

The decision relates to the non-applicability of a concessional tax rate of 10% on long term capital gains.

In October 2009, Cairn UK sold shares of Cairn India Limited (CIL) to Petronas Corporation Intl. Limited (PCIL) for $241 million. The CIL shares were listed on a recognised stock exchange in India but the transaction was completed via an off market share sale.

Cairn UK sought an advance ruling from AAR on taxability of the transaction. Cairn argued that the capital gains were chargeable at a 10% rate in view of the benefit provided by the proviso to section 112 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The AAR rejected Cairn UK’s claim and held that Cairn UK, a non-resident, was not entitled to beneficial tax rate of 10%.

Previously, the AAR allowed the concessional rate in various rulings such as Timken France, Fujitsu Services Limited, Mcleod Russel, Burmah Castrol, Four Star Oil and Compagnie Financiere Hamonm.

The tax department’s appeal against the AAR ruling in Compagnie Financiere Hamonm is already pending before the Supreme Court. The court will jointly hear both these appeals later this week.

Cairn UK is being represented by former solicitor general of India, Harish Salve.

This story was originally published on

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.