China launches pilot programme to reform turnover tax regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China launches pilot programme to reform turnover tax regime

chinaflag.jpg

China this week released details of its pilot programme to reform its turnover tax regime.

The measures, to be piloted in Shanghai from January 1 2012, will see VAT and business tax merged into a single tax. As such, it will shift the burden of taxation from businesses to consumers and will be a welcome step for corporate taxpayers.

"This reform will have far-reaching implications for domestic and foreign suppliers of goods and services in China, affecting overall tax burdens and the allocation of tax burdens in the supply chain and in some cases prompting changes in business models that suppliers have adopted for China," said Jon Eichelberger of Baker & McKenzie.

VAT rates, at present 17% and 13%, will be cut for a number of different industries.

Transportation services will have their rate reduced to 11%, while R&D, IT, cultural, creative, logistic, ancillary, certification and consulting services will all have their rates slashed to 6%.

Leasing of tangible movable property will remain at 17%. Financial services, real estate and construction services will remain outside the scope of the reform, although provisions have been made to incorporate financial services into the VAT system in the future.

Issues may arise over what tax is due where in cases where it is difficult to determine where services take place while the reform remains limited to the Shanghai pilot.

“Quite clearly, businesses subject to the pilot program need to actively engage both internally with key stakeholders, and externally with their advisers, to prepare for the reforms,” said an alert from KPMG.

Despite the geographical limitation of the pilot programme, and its limitation to certain industries, it is expected to inform nationwide reform.

VAT incentives for software

The Chinese tax authorities have also defined the scope of indirect tax incentives that have been put in place to encourage the country's IT sector.

The State Administration of Taxation (SAT) has previously granted VAT refunds, or preferential rates of VAT, on software products. However the impact of these incentives has been limited by a lack of clarity about what counts as a software product.

Circular 100, which applies retrospectively to the beginning of the year, has made clear that VAT refunds apply to computer software and information systems, but also to embedded software - software that is designed for machines such as aircraft, cars and other hardware whose function is not primarily that of a computer.

At the same time, there remains some ambiguity as to whether software companies are liable to pay corporate tax on the VAT refunds they receive.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
Gift this article