For Canadian taxpayers and tax professionals, the general anti-avoidance rule, or GAAR, is synonymous with uncertainty. A new Supreme Court case will address some of the inconsistencies that have developed in the 18 years since the country enacted it. Erin Kelechava speaks to lawyers and the Canadian Revenue Agency about the court cases that have developed the doctrine and where they think the interpretation of GAAR is headed.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable