South Africa resolves disputes with large institutions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa resolves disputes with large institutions

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) expects to receive R3billion ($435million) after settling disputes with major institutions.

The disputes centre on cross-border transactions that the SARS considered to be unacceptable tax avoidance that eroded the South African tax base. The institutions claim to have acted in good faith.

The issue concerns transactions that aim to use tax treaties or relief measures in domestic law to generate tax benefits.

The benefits usually come from the tax relief claimed in excess of any economic double taxation that has occurred on post-tax dividends or interest income.

The tax benefits are usually shared between the institution and its foreign company through the pricings of transactions. These transactions typically lead to a financial loss for the institution in the absence of tax benefits.

Though for confidentiality reasons, the tax authorities did not reveal the names of the taxpayers, the SARS press release referred to structured finance litigation in New Zealand where four banks - BNZ, Westpac, ASB Bank and ANZ National - agreed a settlement of more than NZ$2.2 billion ($1.65 billion) with the Inland Revenue Department.

This suggests that the taxpayers in the settlements in South Africa were also from the financial sector.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Building a transparent culture, prioritising internal promotions and being different from the big four are all key features of A&M Tax’s ambitious plans for India
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
Gift this article