South Africa resolves disputes with large institutions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa resolves disputes with large institutions

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) expects to receive R3billion ($435million) after settling disputes with major institutions.

The disputes centre on cross-border transactions that the SARS considered to be unacceptable tax avoidance that eroded the South African tax base. The institutions claim to have acted in good faith.

The issue concerns transactions that aim to use tax treaties or relief measures in domestic law to generate tax benefits.

The benefits usually come from the tax relief claimed in excess of any economic double taxation that has occurred on post-tax dividends or interest income.

The tax benefits are usually shared between the institution and its foreign company through the pricings of transactions. These transactions typically lead to a financial loss for the institution in the absence of tax benefits.

Though for confidentiality reasons, the tax authorities did not reveal the names of the taxpayers, the SARS press release referred to structured finance litigation in New Zealand where four banks - BNZ, Westpac, ASB Bank and ANZ National - agreed a settlement of more than NZ$2.2 billion ($1.65 billion) with the Inland Revenue Department.

This suggests that the taxpayers in the settlements in South Africa were also from the financial sector.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article