Germany: Ausgangsvermerk does not always suffice as proper proof of export supplies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Ausgangsvermerk does not always suffice as proper proof of export supplies

german-flag-wavy250x167.jpg

Exporters from Germany should be aware that Customs requirements for proper proof of export changed in May.

For zero rated export supplies of goods, proof of transportation must be furnished. According to sections 9 and 10 of the German VAT Implementation Code (UStDV), taxable persons filing electronic export declarations via ATLAS are required to provide the so-called Ausgangsvermerk to the tax authorities.

On May 17 2014, ATLAS release 8.5 was transferred into real-time operation, among other things, changing the Ausgangsvermerk necessary for VAT purposes. This change concerns goods being declared for the export procedure followed by a transit procedure. If a German Customs office of destination terminates the transit procedure, the Ausgangsvermerk will now carry the watermark Ausgangsvermerk gilt nicht für Umsatzsteuerzwecke. By means of ATLAS-participant information dated May 15 2014, German Customs authorities stated that the modification only concerns Customs offices of destination with the competence “customs office of exit - inland.” In a case where the Customs office of destination is a Customs office at the border, the export notice for VAT purposes will further on be issued. The reason for the change is that in the cases at hand Ausgangsvermerke for VAT purposes are issued though the goods are still located in the Customs territory of the EU. The Customs office that issues the Ausgangsvermerk is, however, not able to confirm the export of the goods into a third country.


Significance in practice

Cases in which a transit procedure in connection with an export procedure is terminated by a German Customs office of destination with the competence of a “customs office of exit - inland”, are not the rule. According to Customs law, a Customs office situated in the inland may act as a Customs office of exit if the goods are exported by rail, post, air or sea. It is necessary that the goods are intended to leave the Customs territory of the EU based on a single transport contract by rail, post, air or sea.

If a transit procedure is terminated by a Customs office of destination with the competence “customs office of exit - inland”, an Ausgangsvermerk is automatically created to terminate the export procedure. At this point in time, however, it is uncertain whether the goods will reach a third country. The requirements of a zero rated export supply are not fulfilled. In this case, an Ausgangsvermerk for VAT purposes will no longer be issued. Even before May 17 2014, in these sorts of cases the requirements of a zero rated export supply were not met, though an export notice was issued.


Advice

ATLAS Release 8.5 does not change the legal situation, but rather clarifies it. Companies that carry out export procedures as described above, will no longer be able to use the Ausgangsvermerk for VAT purposes. These companies need to ensure that they obtain a permitted alternative proof of export, for example, a way bill, a bill of lading or a certificate of the freight forwarder (so-called Spediteursbescheinigung). Affected companies should also check whether the correct documentation for past export supplies is available.

Christian Salder (christian.salder@kmlz.de), a lawyer and certified tax consultant, is a partner of KÜFFNER MAUNZ LANGER ZUGMAIER – KMLZ, the principal Germany correspondents of the indirect tax channel on www.internationaltaxreview.com.





more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Sponsored by McCarthy Tétrault
Senior McCarthy Tétrault tax practitioners highlight significant updates and implications for multinationals as Canada’s transfer pricing rules become more closely aligned with OECD guidance
Mada has opened simultaneously in Paris and Dubai with an eight-lawyer team from Trinity International
Gift this article