Switzerland: Switzerland considering notional interest deduction on equity

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Switzerland considering notional interest deduction on equity

savoia.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Reto Savoia


René Zulauf

As part of the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III, which will lead to a replacement of the various special Swiss cantonal tax regimes by a whole host of measures in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe, Switzerland is considering introducing, among other measures, a notional interest deduction on equity. Notional interest deduction on equity is an internationally accepted concept, which has been introduced in Belgium and Luxembourg, among other jurisdictions. The concept is based on the notion that the tax code should not influence the decision on whether to finance a company through debt or equity.

There are several ways to design such a Swiss notional interest deduction for tax purposes that would be granted in addition to the tax deductibility of arm's length interest on debt. While the notional interest deduction will be available to all Swiss companies, its intent is primarily to benefit financing activities.

To this end, and to limit the broad loss of tax revenues that would be brought about by a notional interest deduction on the entire equity of a Swiss company, the notional interest deduction will likely only be granted on 'surplus equity'. Borrowing from the concept of Swiss thin capitalisation limitations, which require a certain equity underpinning per different class of assets, the required surplus equity could be defined in such a way as to mainly benefit financing activities.

While the introduction of a notional interest deduction is controversial in Switzerland mainly because of the feared loss in tax revenues if it were designed too generously, it is expected that it will be introduced in some form. It is the only practical measure to keep existing considerable financing activities of multinationals in Switzerland and to attract additional financing activity.

Reto Savoia (rsavoia@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6357
René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article