Switzerland: Switzerland considering notional interest deduction on equity

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Switzerland considering notional interest deduction on equity

savoia.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Reto Savoia


René Zulauf

As part of the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III, which will lead to a replacement of the various special Swiss cantonal tax regimes by a whole host of measures in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe, Switzerland is considering introducing, among other measures, a notional interest deduction on equity. Notional interest deduction on equity is an internationally accepted concept, which has been introduced in Belgium and Luxembourg, among other jurisdictions. The concept is based on the notion that the tax code should not influence the decision on whether to finance a company through debt or equity.

There are several ways to design such a Swiss notional interest deduction for tax purposes that would be granted in addition to the tax deductibility of arm's length interest on debt. While the notional interest deduction will be available to all Swiss companies, its intent is primarily to benefit financing activities.

To this end, and to limit the broad loss of tax revenues that would be brought about by a notional interest deduction on the entire equity of a Swiss company, the notional interest deduction will likely only be granted on 'surplus equity'. Borrowing from the concept of Swiss thin capitalisation limitations, which require a certain equity underpinning per different class of assets, the required surplus equity could be defined in such a way as to mainly benefit financing activities.

While the introduction of a notional interest deduction is controversial in Switzerland mainly because of the feared loss in tax revenues if it were designed too generously, it is expected that it will be introduced in some form. It is the only practical measure to keep existing considerable financing activities of multinationals in Switzerland and to attract additional financing activity.

Reto Savoia (rsavoia@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6357
René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article