All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

US Outbound: New anti-Inversion regulations address use of disqualified stock



Sean Foley

Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently released long-awaited temporary and proposed regulations addressing the use of certain "disqualified stock" in corporate inversion transactions (T.D. 9654). The new regulations generally adopt the rules previously announced in Notice 2009-78 (2009-40 IRB 452), subject to several important modifications. As general background, the Section 7874 anti-inversion rules apply if pursuant to a plan or series of related transactions:

  1. A foreign corporation acquires (directly or indirectly) substantially all of the assets of a US corporation;

  2. After the acquisition, at least 60% of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation is owned by former shareholders of the US corporation by reason of their prior ownership of stock in the US corporation; and

  3. After the acquisition, the foreign acquiring corporation's expanded affiliated group does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which the foreign acquiring corporation is organised.

For purposes of calculating the ownership percentage described in (ii) above, Section 7874(c)(2)(B) provides that stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is sold in a public offering related to the acquisition is not taken into account (the statutory public offering rule). According to the preamble, this rule furthers the policy that Section 7874 is intended to curtail inversion transactions that "permit corporations and other entities to continue to conduct business in the same manner as they did prior to the inversion".

In Notice 2009-78, the IRS expanded the statutory public offering rule to provide that stock of a foreign acquiring corporation issued in exchange for certain "non-qualified property" is also not taken into account, regardless of whether such stock is issued in a public offering (for example a private placement). The Notice defined "disqualified property" to include (i) cash or cash equivalents, (ii) marketable securities, and (iii) any other property acquired with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of Section 7874. The Notice also provided that "marketable securities" will not include stock of a member of the foreign acquiring corporation's expanded affiliated group (including an entity that becomes a member pursuant to the same transaction as the acquisition).

One of the more significant modifications from the Notice in the temporary regulations is the expansion of the definition of "disqualified property" to include "disqualified obligations." The temporary regulations define a "disqualified obligation" as an obligation of (i) a member of the foreign acquiring corporation's expanded affiliated group, (ii) a former shareholder of the US corporation, or (iii) a person that, before or after the acquisition, is related to any person described in (i) or (ii) above.

The temporary regulations also expand the scope of the Notice to provide that stock issued by a foreign acquiring corporation in exchange for property that is not "non-qualified property" will nevertheless be ignored if such stock is subsequently exchanged for the satisfaction or assumption of an obligation associated with the transferred property.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the new regulations include a welcome de minimis exception providing that the disqualified stock rules described above do not apply if, without regard to those rules, the former shareholders of the US corporation own less than 5% of the foreign acquiring corporation.

The newly-issued regulations are generally effective with respect to matters covered in Notice 2009-78 for acquisitions completed on or after September 17, 2009, and are otherwise effective for acquisitions completed on or after January 16, 2014 (unless the taxpayer elects to apply the earlier date).

Sean Foley ( and Landon McGrew (


Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Biden administration is about to give $80 billion to the Internal Revenue Service to enhance the tax authority’s enforcement processes and IT systems.
Audi, Porsche, and Kia say their US clients will face higher prices under the Inflation Reduction Act after the legislation axes an important tax credit for electric vehicle production.
This week Brazil’s former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva came out in support of uniting Brazil’s consumption taxes into one VAT regime, while the US Senate approved a corporate minimum tax rate.
The Dutch TP decree marks a turn in the Netherlands as the country aligns its tax policies with OECD standards over claims it is a tax haven.
Gorka Echevarria talks to reporter Siqalane Taho about how inflation, e-invoicing and technology are affecting the laser printing firm in a post-COVID world.
Tax directors have called on companies to better secure their data as they generate ever-increasing amounts of information due to greater government scrutiny.
Incoming amendments to the treaty could increase costs on non-resident Indian service providers.
Experts say the proposed minimum tax does not align with the OECD’s pillar two regime and risks other countries pulling out.
The Malawian government has targeted US gemstone miner Columbia Gem House, while Amgen has successfully consolidated two separate tax disputes with the Internal Revenue Service.
ITR's latest quarterly PDF is now live, leading on the rise of tax technology.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree