International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why you should consider the Fair Tax Mark

It would be an understatement to say that many large corporations have found their reputations dragged through the mud over their tax affairs.

Google's laudable pledge of "don't be evil" backfired when British parliamentarians led by the combative Margaret Hodge decided that the company's tax arrangements came across as just a little bit too evil for their liking. Much of Starbucks' good work building up a positive corporate social responsibility profile over sustainability and support for fair trade products was undone when it was revealed to have paid no tax for 14 out of the 15 years it had been operating in the UK. The scandal and subsequent boycott threatened to hit Starbucks' sales by 24% – according to researchers at Manchester Business School – and caused it to promise to make a voluntary tax contribution.


"If the media won’t write you a good tax story, you can write your own"


The public are up in arms. Governments are cracking down. What companies need is a good tax story. And that's where the Fair Tax Mark comes in. Launched last month, the Fair Tax Mark seeks to be to corporate taxation what the Fair Trade Mark is to coffee and cocoa. It rewards companies for good tax behaviour. It is a badge of honour for companies shown to be acting within the spirit of the law and eschewing tax havens.

How much tax a company pays is not the overriding factor. After all, there are perfectly legitimate reasons why a company may pay no tax in a given jurisdiction in a certain year. Losses and reliefs, for example. Instead the Fair Tax Mark judges a company on its tax policy, its transparency and its accountability.

The Mark was launched in the UK with the backing of the Midcounties Co-op, Unity Trust Bank and the Phone Co-op. As such, it's a modest start – when it comes to corporate social responsibility, these companies are very much among the usual suspects. But the Mark's makers hope over time it will be taken up much more widely.

The saying used to go that there is "no such thing as a good tax story". The Fair Tax Mark is a chance for multinational corporations to grab the bull by the horns and change that. If the media won't write you a good tax story, you can write your own. The most successful businesses know how to turn crisis into opportunity. Companies are facing their greatest ever crisis over tax and PR. And their greatest ever opportunity.

Salman Shaheen

Editor, International Tax Reviewsshaheen@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.