Cyprus: Cyprus expands its treaty network with Lithuania and Guernsey

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Cyprus: Cyprus expands its treaty network with Lithuania and Guernsey

kokoni.jpg

Zoe Kokoni

Cyprus, which has been long-established as a solid economic and business centre worldwide, seeks to reinforce its title as a beneficial investment hub by expanding its double tax treaty network and creating stronger economic and trade relations with other contracting states.

Cyprus and Lithuania DTT

On June 21 2013, Cyprus and Lithuania signed their first double tax treaty (DTT). Since then, the countries have ratified the agreement, which will enter into force on January 1 2015.

In summary, the new provisions of the ratified agreement cover:

  • Dividends: No withholding tax (0%) where the recipient is a company and

    • is the beneficial owner of the dividends; and

    • owns at least (minimum) 10 % capital of the company.

    • In all other cases a 5% withholding tax shall be applicable.

    • Interest: No withholding tax (0%).

  • Royalties: 5% withholding tax provided that the recipient is the beneficial owner.

  • Capital gains: gains, resulting from the disposal of shares, are taxable in the country in which the alienator of the shares is tax resident.

Cyprus and Guernsey DTT

On July 15 2014 Cyprus and Guernsey signed a double taxation avoidance agreement, which will enter into force upon the ratification of the agreement by the two contracting states. The agreement is based on the OECD Model Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation on Income and on Capital.

Briefly, the main provisions of the agreement between the two contracting states provide a 0% withholding tax rate for dividends, interest and royalty payments. For capital gains, gains for a resident of one of the two countries (ex. A), resulting from the disposal of immovable property in the other country (ex. B), will be taxed in the country where the immovable property is situated (ex. B). Gains resulting from the disposal of shares are taxable in the country in which the alienator of the shares is tax resident.

Zoe Kokoni (zoe.kokoni@eurofast.eu)
Eurofast, Cyprus office

Tel: +357 22 699 222

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
Gift this article