Cyprus: Cyprus expands its treaty network with Lithuania and Guernsey

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cyprus: Cyprus expands its treaty network with Lithuania and Guernsey

kokoni.jpg

Zoe Kokoni

Cyprus, which has been long-established as a solid economic and business centre worldwide, seeks to reinforce its title as a beneficial investment hub by expanding its double tax treaty network and creating stronger economic and trade relations with other contracting states.

Cyprus and Lithuania DTT

On June 21 2013, Cyprus and Lithuania signed their first double tax treaty (DTT). Since then, the countries have ratified the agreement, which will enter into force on January 1 2015.

In summary, the new provisions of the ratified agreement cover:

  • Dividends: No withholding tax (0%) where the recipient is a company and

    • is the beneficial owner of the dividends; and

    • owns at least (minimum) 10 % capital of the company.

    • In all other cases a 5% withholding tax shall be applicable.

    • Interest: No withholding tax (0%).

  • Royalties: 5% withholding tax provided that the recipient is the beneficial owner.

  • Capital gains: gains, resulting from the disposal of shares, are taxable in the country in which the alienator of the shares is tax resident.

Cyprus and Guernsey DTT

On July 15 2014 Cyprus and Guernsey signed a double taxation avoidance agreement, which will enter into force upon the ratification of the agreement by the two contracting states. The agreement is based on the OECD Model Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation on Income and on Capital.

Briefly, the main provisions of the agreement between the two contracting states provide a 0% withholding tax rate for dividends, interest and royalty payments. For capital gains, gains for a resident of one of the two countries (ex. A), resulting from the disposal of immovable property in the other country (ex. B), will be taxed in the country where the immovable property is situated (ex. B). Gains resulting from the disposal of shares are taxable in the country in which the alienator of the shares is tax resident.

Zoe Kokoni (zoe.kokoni@eurofast.eu)
Eurofast, Cyprus office

Tel: +357 22 699 222

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article