Switzerland: Corporate tax reform as per draft legislation would make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Corporate tax reform as per draft legislation would make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals

kistler.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler


René Zulauf

The draft legislation in regard to the so-called Corporate Tax Reform III was published on September 22 2014 and it turned out be more attractive than generally expected. If the reform – which brings along a replacement of all special tax regimes by other measures presumably by 2019 – will be implemented according to the draft legislation, Switzerland will become more attractive for multinationals. The position of Switzerland as a holding, financing and intellectual property (IP) location will be strengthened. Switzerland will have one of the most liberal participation exemption regimes, with no minimum thresholds, no minimum holding period and no controlled foreign companies (CFC) or subject-to-tax rules. Financing activities in particular will benefit from a notional interest deduction (NID) on equity. Income related to patents will be able to benefit from a very liberal patent box regime.

In addition, to attract new companies, a step-up will be granted upon immigration of a company to Switzerland which would enable the company to pay very little tax during the first 10 years.

Above all, the reform will bring long-term planning security, a step-up for tax purposes that can be amortised tax effectively over 10 years once the reform is implemented in 2019 or 2020 will ensure that companies, which are transitioning out of a tax privileged regime, such as a mixed company regime, can keep their existing tax rate for up to 15 years.

The draft legislation is now in the consultation process where interested parties can suggest changes to the legislation. The clear intention of this reform is not only to make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals, but also to ensure that the proposed tax regimes and measures are BEPS-proof and in line with EU regulations.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article