Switzerland: Corporate tax reform as per draft legislation would make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Corporate tax reform as per draft legislation would make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals

kistler.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler


René Zulauf

The draft legislation in regard to the so-called Corporate Tax Reform III was published on September 22 2014 and it turned out be more attractive than generally expected. If the reform – which brings along a replacement of all special tax regimes by other measures presumably by 2019 – will be implemented according to the draft legislation, Switzerland will become more attractive for multinationals. The position of Switzerland as a holding, financing and intellectual property (IP) location will be strengthened. Switzerland will have one of the most liberal participation exemption regimes, with no minimum thresholds, no minimum holding period and no controlled foreign companies (CFC) or subject-to-tax rules. Financing activities in particular will benefit from a notional interest deduction (NID) on equity. Income related to patents will be able to benefit from a very liberal patent box regime.

In addition, to attract new companies, a step-up will be granted upon immigration of a company to Switzerland which would enable the company to pay very little tax during the first 10 years.

Above all, the reform will bring long-term planning security, a step-up for tax purposes that can be amortised tax effectively over 10 years once the reform is implemented in 2019 or 2020 will ensure that companies, which are transitioning out of a tax privileged regime, such as a mixed company regime, can keep their existing tax rate for up to 15 years.

The draft legislation is now in the consultation process where interested parties can suggest changes to the legislation. The clear intention of this reform is not only to make Switzerland more attractive for multinationals, but also to ensure that the proposed tax regimes and measures are BEPS-proof and in line with EU regulations.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article