International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Amendments to the Bulgarian Public Procurement Act

koleva.jpg

Rossitza Koleva

The Bulgarian government promulgated in May 2014 the law amending and supplementing one of the country's key economic laws, the Public Procurement Act (PPA), by introducing a number of changes, some effective as of July 1 2014 and others as of October 1 2014. The main target is to increase transparency and improve the supervision of procedures, as well as to eliminate the possibilities for corruption. The PPA is placed in a very dynamic environment – both at European and national level – and this determines the need for its adaptation. On the one hand the Act regulates the procedures to be followed for spending of public funds for the implementation of state, municipality and other public entity projects, while on the other hand, precisely because of this focus of the law, it could become, if applied effectively and correctly, one of the main levers of market regulation. The manner in which the Act is applied effects whether small and medium-sized enterprises will be encouraged, whether the market competition will increase, whether citizens will feel that public funds are being spent effectively and appropriately for the benefit of the community, and ultimately, whether the confidence in the institutions and the authority of the public sector will increase.

The amendments and supplements, once summarisied, can be broadly categorised as follows:

Measures to reduce the bureaucratic and administrative burden

One of the new obligations introduced in this direction is the obligation of authorities to publish all documents on the buyer's profile except for the confidential or classified information. Thus, in addition to achieving maximum publicity, it becomes unnecessary for participants to be forced to buy paper-based tender documentation.

Measures to improve the access of small, medium and start-up enterprises to public procurements

One of the changes here completely fulfills one of the requirements of Article 44 of Directive 2004/18/ EC, which defines that the scope of the information and the minimum requirements related to a specific procurement must be proportionate to the subject of the contract. The ultimate goal of this proposal is, by means of introducing the principle of proportionality, to create conditions for the development of competition.

Other amendments of the Act are geared towards:

  • refining definitions and procedure rules to promote competition and to reduce the administrative burden;

  • increasing the level of administrative expertise and qualification;

  • control of execution of contracts;

  • openness and transparency. The aim is to achieve full extent of publicity, not just for the procedures, but also for the execution of public contracts; and

  • labour protection and creating real opportunities for the implementation of procurement of specialised enterprises or cooperatives of people with disabilities.

All amendments here aim at providing opportunities for small and medium business, opportunities for new jobs, and opportunities for improving the effectiveness and appropriateness in spending public funds – either Bulgarian or European.

Rossitza Koleva (rossitza.koleva@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Brazilian government may be about to align the country’s unique system with OECD standards, but this is a long-awaited TP reform and success is uncertain.
Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.