International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Spontaneous exchange of tax rulings



René Schreiber

Veronique Parmentier

Could multinationals, in the future, see their Swiss tax rulings sent to foreign jurisdictions by the Swiss authorities? In 2013 Switzerland signed the Convention on Multilateral Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (the Convention), which provides for spontaneous exchange of information. In January 2015 the Swiss Federal Council initiated a decree allowing ratification of the Convention and the amendment of the Swiss law on administrative assistance to introduce spontaneous exchange of information into domestic law. A draft decree was submitted to the parliament in June 2015 and first exchanges of information are expected as from January 1 2018. The question remains as to whether these exchanges will also include Swiss advanced tax rulings.

Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Convention lists the cases in which a jurisdiction should spontaneously transmit information to another jurisdiction. The OECD Manual on the implementation of exchange of information for tax purposes provides additional guidance regarding such circumstances. However, none of these documents refer explicitly to tax rulings.

The Swiss Federal Council will issue a decree providing more details regarding the obligations resulting from the Convention, and the tax authorities will issue some practical directives that will take into account the practice in other jurisdictions as well as international standards. Based on the current parliamentary work, this includes the framework being developed by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices under the BEPS umbrella for the spontaneous exchange of tax rulings.

Therefore, it has to be expected that any tax ruling relating to a cross-border transaction involving movable income, which benefits from a preferential regime and a low effective rate of taxation, would fall under the scope of the new spontaneous exchange of information. It is, at this stage, less clear for other tax rulings. Many current tax rulings including the taxation of mixed companies, holding companies or principal structures will most likely fall into the first category.

René Schreiber ( and Veronique Parmentier (


Tel: +41 58 279 7216 and +41 58 279 7856


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.