All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Canada: Filing deadline approaching for Canadian foreign affiliate dumping rules

bailey.jpg

jones.jpg

Bryan Bailey


Josh Jones

The Canadian foreign affiliate dumping (FAD) rules were introduced in March 2012 to prevent foreign multinational corporations from achieving certain tax advantages by causing a Canadian subsidiary to hold investments in foreign (non-Canadian) affiliates (FA). Generally, the FAD rules apply where a corporation resident in Canada (CRIC) that is controlled by a non-resident corporation (the parent) makes an 'investment' in an FA. An investment is defined broadly to include, among other things, an acquisition of shares, contribution of capital, and certain acquisitions of debt. Where the FAD rules apply, the CRIC may be deemed to have paid a dividend to its parent generally equal to the amount of the investment, unless certain provisions apply to reduce the paid-up capital (PUC) of the CRIC's shares by the amount of the investment (PUC offset rule). Any such deemed dividend would be subject to Canadian withholding tax, even though no amount may be extracted from Canada.

For a deemed dividend to be reduced by the PUC offset rule, the CRIC is required to file a form with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) on or before the CRIC's filing due date for its taxation year that includes the time in which the deemed dividend would otherwise arise. The FAD rules were amended in December 2014 to add this requirement, but it applies to all transactions occurring after the introduction of the rules in March 2012. Grandfathering provisions generally extend the filing deadline to the later of December 16 2015 and the CRIC's filing due date for its taxation year that includes December 16 2014.

If the form is not filed on time, the CRIC will be deemed to have paid a dividend to the parent on the filing due date (although, in certain circumstances, any resulting Canadian withholding tax may be refunded). As there is currently no prescribed form, the CRA accepts that a letter containing certain specific information will satisfy the form requirement.

As the filing deadline approaches, foreign multinational corporations should consider the application of the FAD rules to any investments made by a Canadian subsidiary in an FA during or after March 2012 to determine whether the filing of the form is required to avoid the application of Canadian withholding tax.

Bryan Bailey (bryan.bailey@blakes.com) and Josh Jones (josh.jones@blakes.com), Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2297 and +1 416 863 4278

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree