International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


The focus of many of the articles in this guide on issues tied to the multilateral efforts to counter tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) shows that taxpayers across Latin America are keeping a close watch on global developments.

Many of the countries in the region are not OECD members, but the level of Latin American awareness and engagement is testament to the potential impact the project will have on international tax rules.

But taxpayers are also having to contend with the effects of domestic reform packages implemented throughout the region in the past two or three years. As new and updated national measures continue to settle in, taxpayers and advisers are ensuring they keep pace by continuing to tweak their compliance systems and operational processes. This is particularly relevant in Chile and Mexico, given the volume and significance of changes which were made to the tax codes of these two countries during 2014.

It is also evident in Brazil, where legislative updates are handed down on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Such frequent changes contribute to an insecure environment since authorities and auditors do not always respect legal provisions in the same way that authorities in other countries do.

The most concerning recent example of this is July's provisional measure 685, which shows the authorities' willingness to shift the compliance burden further onto taxpayers, by requiring them to disclose to the authorities any transaction or tax planning structure where the business motive is "unclear". This is somewhat ironic, given how unclear and ambiguous some of the measure's terminology is (for example, references to "transactions that were structured in an unusual manner"). Taxpayers and advisers did not welcome the measure, and a question remains over its conformity with the law.

Other issues dominating taxpayer time and resources centre on technology challenges and the volume of declarations required. Add to this high tax rates and it is clear the outlook is less than rosy for taxpayers in Brazil and beyond. And with the Brazilian economy struggling, coupled with high levels of public debt, rate-raising, as well as base-broadening and the creation of new taxes, is set to continue into 2016.

In this context, International Tax Review brings you the 12th edition of its Latin America regional guide, published in association with Baker & McKenzie, Chevez Ruiz Zamarripa y Cia, Deloitte, EY and PwC.

Matthew Gilleard


International Tax Review

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.