Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

The focus of many of the articles in this guide on issues tied to the multilateral efforts to counter tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) shows that taxpayers across Latin America are keeping a close watch on global developments.

Many of the countries in the region are not OECD members, but the level of Latin American awareness and engagement is testament to the potential impact the project will have on international tax rules.

But taxpayers are also having to contend with the effects of domestic reform packages implemented throughout the region in the past two or three years. As new and updated national measures continue to settle in, taxpayers and advisers are ensuring they keep pace by continuing to tweak their compliance systems and operational processes. This is particularly relevant in Chile and Mexico, given the volume and significance of changes which were made to the tax codes of these two countries during 2014.

It is also evident in Brazil, where legislative updates are handed down on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Such frequent changes contribute to an insecure environment since authorities and auditors do not always respect legal provisions in the same way that authorities in other countries do.

The most concerning recent example of this is July's provisional measure 685, which shows the authorities' willingness to shift the compliance burden further onto taxpayers, by requiring them to disclose to the authorities any transaction or tax planning structure where the business motive is "unclear". This is somewhat ironic, given how unclear and ambiguous some of the measure's terminology is (for example, references to "transactions that were structured in an unusual manner"). Taxpayers and advisers did not welcome the measure, and a question remains over its conformity with the law.

Other issues dominating taxpayer time and resources centre on technology challenges and the volume of declarations required. Add to this high tax rates and it is clear the outlook is less than rosy for taxpayers in Brazil and beyond. And with the Brazilian economy struggling, coupled with high levels of public debt, rate-raising, as well as base-broadening and the creation of new taxes, is set to continue into 2016.

In this context, International Tax Review brings you the 12th edition of its Latin America regional guide, published in association with Baker & McKenzie, Chevez Ruiz Zamarripa y Cia, Deloitte, EY and PwC.

Matthew Gilleard

Editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
The two tax partners have significant experience and expertise in transactional and tax structuring matters
Gift this article