Irish Finance Bill: Country-by-country reporting

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Irish Finance Bill: Country-by-country reporting

The Irish Finance Bill published on October 22 2015 contains details of Ireland's response to Action 13 of BEPS - the minimum standard of country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

While Action 13 is described as a "re-examination of transfer pricing documentation", CbCR could enable countries with relatively high tax rates to target multinationals with taxable profits in countries with effectively low or no tax applying to profits by amending their tax laws to target perceived avoidance. This, however, could be against the underlying agreed principles of BEPS. For groups inverted under an Irish tax resident parent or existing as Irish parented groups, the proposed legislation will shift the compliance burden up a gear. The key point to note is that the Irish Revenue exchange of information obtained through CbCR appears to be without taxpayer's consent, or indeed notification. Failure to comply could attract penalties under Irish tax law and under the Irish Companies Act 2014.

The draft legislation takes effect for fiscal years commencing on or after January 1 2016 and will apply where the ultimate parent is tax resident in Ireland whose consolidated group turnover is more than €750 million ($822 million). Hence, Irish parented groups with a December 31 year end will have less than three months to prepare for the new regime. Country-by-Country reporting will need to be reported for the year ended December 31 2016 by 31 December 2017.

The information to be filed with Irish Revenue is consistent and follows the OECD's CbCR template. The parent company will need to disclose information in tabular form as set out in Annex III of Action 13. For ease of reference, the tables are set out below.

Table 1. Overview of allocation of income, taxes and business activities by tax jurisdiction

table1-570 Click on table to enlarge

Table 2. List of all the Constituent Entities of the MNE group included in each aggregation per tax jurisdiction

table2-570

Click on table to enlarge

The Irish draft legislation also provides for regulations to be prepared by the Irish Revenue to cover:

  • making provision for an Irish resident "surrogate parent" entity to provide a CbC report to the Irish Revenue (broadly this applies where the ultimate parent jurisdiction laws or agreement with Ireland does not oblige the ultimate parent to file a CbC report);

  • notifying the Irish Revenue of CbC reports filed with certain overseas tax authorities;

  • making provision as to how information contained in a CbC report is to be used; and

  • making provision for preserving the confidentiality of the information contained in a CbC report.

The draft legislation gives authority to the Irish Revenue to share CbC reports with other tax or governmental authorities, provided that jurisdiction and Ireland have entered into a qualifying agreement on the exchange of information. Given that Ireland has 72 double taxation agreement partners and a further 25 tax information exchange partners, this gives Irish Revenue considerable reach. There is no provision to notify the Irish parent of the proposed sharing of information or give an appeal against such sharing. It is hoped regulation may deal with this area.

A failure to make a return which would include the filing of an incorrect or incomplete return can result in a penalty of €19,045 plus €2,535 for each day on which the failure continues. Under Companies Act 2014, the directors of Irish incorporated companies are required to confirm the company's tax affairs are in compliance with Irish tax law. Clearly, if there is inadequate CbC reporting, there could be Companies Act penalties too.

As the regime commences with effect from January 1 2016, multinationals with their ultimate parent (or their surrogate parent entity as the case may be) resident in Ireland will need to consider the need to provide detailed information to the Irish Revenue authorities regarding the location and nature of activities of the various group members. This invariably will lead to groups having to consider group reorganisations and rationalisations in advance of filing of their first CbCR. In implementing the compliance regime for CbCR, boards should consider the benefit of independent legal advice that under Companies Act 2014, their systems and arrangements are designed to secure material compliance with the company's obligations.

For further information, please contact:

Gulliver-John
Henson-Robert
Dineen-Maura

John Gulliver
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 5007
jgulliver@mhc.ie

Robert Henson
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2314
rhenson@mhc.ie

Maura Dineen
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2444
mdineen@mhc.ie



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article