All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Irish Finance Bill: Country-by-country reporting

The Irish Finance Bill published on October 22 2015 contains details of Ireland's response to Action 13 of BEPS - the minimum standard of country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

While Action 13 is described as a "re-examination of transfer pricing documentation", CbCR could enable countries with relatively high tax rates to target multinationals with taxable profits in countries with effectively low or no tax applying to profits by amending their tax laws to target perceived avoidance. This, however, could be against the underlying agreed principles of BEPS. For groups inverted under an Irish tax resident parent or existing as Irish parented groups, the proposed legislation will shift the compliance burden up a gear. The key point to note is that the Irish Revenue exchange of information obtained through CbCR appears to be without taxpayer's consent, or indeed notification. Failure to comply could attract penalties under Irish tax law and under the Irish Companies Act 2014.

The draft legislation takes effect for fiscal years commencing on or after January 1 2016 and will apply where the ultimate parent is tax resident in Ireland whose consolidated group turnover is more than €750 million ($822 million). Hence, Irish parented groups with a December 31 year end will have less than three months to prepare for the new regime. Country-by-Country reporting will need to be reported for the year ended December 31 2016 by 31 December 2017.

The information to be filed with Irish Revenue is consistent and follows the OECD's CbCR template. The parent company will need to disclose information in tabular form as set out in Annex III of Action 13. For ease of reference, the tables are set out below.

Table 1. Overview of allocation of income, taxes and business activities by tax jurisdiction

table1-570 Click on table to enlarge

Table 2. List of all the Constituent Entities of the MNE group included in each aggregation per tax jurisdiction


Click on table to enlarge

The Irish draft legislation also provides for regulations to be prepared by the Irish Revenue to cover:

  • making provision for an Irish resident "surrogate parent" entity to provide a CbC report to the Irish Revenue (broadly this applies where the ultimate parent jurisdiction laws or agreement with Ireland does not oblige the ultimate parent to file a CbC report);

  • notifying the Irish Revenue of CbC reports filed with certain overseas tax authorities;

  • making provision as to how information contained in a CbC report is to be used; and

  • making provision for preserving the confidentiality of the information contained in a CbC report.

The draft legislation gives authority to the Irish Revenue to share CbC reports with other tax or governmental authorities, provided that jurisdiction and Ireland have entered into a qualifying agreement on the exchange of information. Given that Ireland has 72 double taxation agreement partners and a further 25 tax information exchange partners, this gives Irish Revenue considerable reach. There is no provision to notify the Irish parent of the proposed sharing of information or give an appeal against such sharing. It is hoped regulation may deal with this area.

A failure to make a return which would include the filing of an incorrect or incomplete return can result in a penalty of €19,045 plus €2,535 for each day on which the failure continues. Under Companies Act 2014, the directors of Irish incorporated companies are required to confirm the company's tax affairs are in compliance with Irish tax law. Clearly, if there is inadequate CbC reporting, there could be Companies Act penalties too.

As the regime commences with effect from January 1 2016, multinationals with their ultimate parent (or their surrogate parent entity as the case may be) resident in Ireland will need to consider the need to provide detailed information to the Irish Revenue authorities regarding the location and nature of activities of the various group members. This invariably will lead to groups having to consider group reorganisations and rationalisations in advance of filing of their first CbCR. In implementing the compliance regime for CbCR, boards should consider the benefit of independent legal advice that under Companies Act 2014, their systems and arrangements are designed to secure material compliance with the company's obligations.

For further information, please contact:


John Gulliver
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 5007

Robert Henson
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2314

Maura Dineen
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2444

More from across our site

The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
This week the Biden administration has run into opposition over a proposal for a federal gas tax holiday, while the European Parliament has approved a plan for an EU carbon border mechanism.
Businesses need to improve on data management to ensure tax departments become much more integrated, according to Microsoft’s chief digital officer at a KPMG event.
Businesses must ensure any alternative benchmark rate is included in their TP studies and approved by tax authorities, as Libor for the US ends in exactly a year.
Tax directors warn that a lack of adequate planning for VAT rule changes could leave businesses exposed to regulatory errors and costly fines.
Tax professionals have urged suppliers of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland to pause any plans to restructure their supply chains following the NI Protocol Bill.
Tax leaders say communication with peers is important for risk management, especially on how to approach regional authorities.
Advances in compliance tools in international markets and the digitalisation of global tax administrations are increasing in-house demand for technologists.
The US fast-food company has agreed to pay €1.25 billion to settle the French investigation into its transfer pricing arrangements over allegations of tax evasion.
HM Revenue and Customs said the UK pillar two legislation will be delayed until at least December 2023, while ITR reported on a secret Netflix settlement and an IMF study on VAT cuts.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree