International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Norwegian Budget 2016: Corporate tax cut and transfer pricing changes post-BEPS


Petter Gruner

Henrik Brødholt

On October 7 2015, the Norwegian government presented the 2016 Budget to parliament. The key tax proposals in the 2016 Budget relevant for foreign corporate investors are as follows:

  • The corporate tax rate would be reduced from 27% to 25%;

  • The net interest deduction limitation rules that were introduced with effect from 2014 would be amended so that net interest paid to related parties would not be deductible to the extent the total net interest expense exceeds 25% (currently 30%) of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), based on tax figures;

  • One element of BEPS action 2 (neutralising the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements) would be adopted – the Norwegian participation exemption for dividends would not apply to the extent the distributing entity is entitled to a deduction for the distribution; and

  • The treatment of certain acquisition and sales costs would be clarified. According to Norwegian tax law, acquisition costs must be capitalised. To the extent the costs relate to shares covered by the Norwegian participation exemption method, the costs will never be deductible. The same is the case for costs incurred by the seller in connection with the sale of such shares. It has been unclear whether costs incurred to acquire or sell such shares should be treated the same way in cases where the acquisition or sale fails. It is proposed that such costs would be non-deductible to the extent they relate to shares covered by the Norwegian participation exemption method.

Tax white paper

The white paper presented by the Ministry of Finance is a follow-up to the Scheel advisory panel's report from 2014. The white paper does not contain any proposed wording of specific sections in the Tax Act, but rather discusses what the main content should cover. It is supplementary to the Budget and looks at possible future actions. Public consultation will be held on the proposals before a concrete law is presented to parliament, and tax law changes would not be implemented before 2017 at the earliest. The main proposals are the following:

  • The corporate tax rate would be further reduced to 22% by 2018;

  • The domestic interest deduction limitation rules would be extended to apply to interest paid to third parties. The related commentary is in line with the recently published final report on BEPS action 4 (interest deductions and other financial payments);

  • The introduction of withholding tax on interest and royalties would be considered; and

  • Rules implementing a number of other measures in line with BEPS actions would be introduced

Implementation of BEPS actions 8 to 10

BEPS actions 8 to 10 on transfer pricing will take immediate effect in Norway the moment they are formally adopted by the OECD council, as the Norwegian Tax Act section 13-1 refers directly to the OECD guidelines. Moreover, the actions can be seen as clarifying interpretations of article 9.1 in the OECD and UN model tax treaties. As article 9.1 can be found in most Norwegian tax treaties, actions 8 to 10 could also be considered to take immediate effect under this view. To the extent the changes can be interpreted as only being clarificatory in nature, they could potentially be given effect also for earlier years, similar to the possible retroactive effect of clarifying changes to the model tax treaty through the OECD commentaries. It remains an open question, however, as to whether the Norwegian tax authorities will apply this in practice.

Petter Gruner ( and Henrik Brødholt (

Tel: +47 23 27 91 65


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum heard that Italy’s VAT investigation into Meta has the potential to set new and expensive tax principles that would likely be adopted around the world
Police are now investigating the leak of confidential tax information by a former PwC partner at the request of the Australian government.