Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

Chin-Michela-100
Conomy-Mark-100

Michela Chin

Mark Conomy

Provisional measure 692/2015 (PM 692) was released by the executive branch of the Brazilian government on September 22 2015. Among other items, PM 692 amends the tax rates applicable to individuals and certain companies on the capital gain deriving from the sale of assets and rights of any nature.

In principle, non-resident companies are subject to the rules applicable for individuals when calculating their Brazilian capital gains tax liability under the current law. Therefore, although PM 692 is, in substance, addressed toward individuals in Brazil, the implications extend to non-resident companies.

Broadly, the previous rules provided that such capital gains should be subject to tax at the rate of 15%. Pursuant to PM 692, the rates should apply as follows:

  • 15% in relation to the portion of gains that do not surpass BRL 1 million ($260,000);

  • 20% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 1 million and do not surpass BRL 5 million;

  • 25% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 5 million and do not surpass BRL 20 million; and

  • 30% in relation to the portion of gains that surpass BRL 20 million.

In the event of alienation of a part of the same asset or right as from the second transaction/operation, the capital gain should be calculated with capital gains from previous transactions in order to determine the relevant tax, deducting the amount of tax paid on the previous transaction(s).

Furthermore, pursuant to PM 692, capital gains derived by a company, arising on the alienation of non-current assets or rights, should also be subject to the above rates – except for companies which apply the actual, presumed or arbitrary profit methods (being the key methods of calculating tax for Brazilian entities).

PM 692 enters into effect on the date of publication, however the rates outlined above for capital gains taxation would only take effect from January 1 2016.

Finally, there have already been several issues identified with the current text, such as how the rules should apply to non-residents located in 'tax havens' (subject to withholding tax at 25%), with further issues likely to be raised as the measure is analysed in greater detail.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article