International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Australia’s response to BEPS to date


Melissa Lim

In the context of the October 5 release of the final package of measures relating to the BEPS project, the Australian Government has signalled its commitment to the BEPS process as evident in the new Treasurer's October 6 media release. The Treasurer highlighted that "Australia is firmly on the right track" in supporting the BEPS measures and outlined Australia's responses to the BEPS action items to date.

Ensuring multinationals pay their fair share of tax in Australia

The Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law (MAAL), which has been introduced into parliament, seeks to ensure that certain companies will be subject to tax in Australia where they make sales in Australia but book that revenue offshore. The same Bill also introduced the country-by-country reporting (CbCR) requirements as well as doubling the penalties imposed on multinationals which seek to avoid tax through transfer pricing and profit shifting schemes. As outlined by the Treasurer, this Bill is aligned with the objectives of BEPS Action 7 which aims to prevent the artificial avoidance of a permanent establishment, as well as with the objectives of BEPS Action 13 which seeks to promote transparency through the implementation of CbCR. With respect to the MAAL, the Commissioner of Taxation, in his media release on October 7 2015, has expressed his support for the Bill and confirmed that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will be entering into discussions with around 80 multinational enterprises which will be potentially affected by the MAAL.

Hybrids and financing arrangements

The Australian Government has also initiated efforts to combat or neutralise hybrid mismatches (BEPS Action 2), by tasking the Board of Taxation to consult on the OECD's recommendations and provide a report in March 2016. While the OECD has also released final deliverables on designing effective controlled foreign company (CFC) rules (Action 3) and limiting base erosion involving interest deductions and other financial payments (Action 4), it is unlikely that the Australian Government will introduce any new measures in this regard. As outlined by the Treasurer, Australia's CFC rules already meet the OECD best practice guidelines and Australia has already tightened its thin capitalisation rules by, for example, reducing the safe harbour threshold from 75% to 60% effective from July 1 2014.

'Netflix Tax' and the digital economy

Last but not least, in response to addressing the tax challenges of the digital economy (Action 1), the Australian Government has obtained the in-principle agreement of the states and territories to apply goods and services tax (GST) to digital products and services imported by Australian consumers. In the May 2015 Federal Budget, the Government announced that Australia's 10% GST would be extended to apply to inbound supplies of intangibles (such as digital content) made by non-residents from outside Australia to consumers in Australia. If legislated, the reforms (which are often cited in the media as the 'Netflix Tax') will apply from July 1 2017 – subject to any transitional arrangements. In early October, the government released a second tranche of consultation draft legislation, together with associated explanatory materials, which provides further insight into how the government intends to implement and apply these reforms.

Melissa Lim (

DLA Piper

Tel: +61 2 9286 8239


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.