US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service recently released final regulations addressing when a foreign corporation's expanded affiliated group (EAG) will be considered to have substantial business activities in a foreign country for purposes of determining whether the foreign corporation is a surrogate foreign corporation within the meaning of the section 7874 anti-inversion rules (TD 9720). The new regulations generally adopt temporary regulations that were issued in 2012 (TD 9592) with certain modifications. As general background, a foreign corporation will be treated as a surrogate foreign corporation with respect to a US corporation (and thus subject to the section 7874 anti-inversion rules) if pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions):

  • The foreign corporation acquires (directly or indirectly) substantially all of the assets of a US corporation;

  • After the acquisition, at least 60% of the stock of the foreign corporation is owned by former shareholders of the US corporation by reason of their prior ownership of stock in the US corporation; and

  • After the acquisition, the foreign corporation's EAG does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which the foreign corporation is organised.

The 2012 temporary regulations provided a bright-line test for determining whether a foreign corporation's EAG has substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country. Under this bright-line test, an EAG is considered to have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country only if at least 25% of the group employees, group assets, and group income are located or derived in the relevant foreign country. The final regulations retain this bright-line test, subject to certain modifications described below.

First, the final regulations clarify certain rules for determining the members of a foreign corporation's EAG by providing that an entity that is not a member of the EAG on the acquisition date is not a member of the EAG even if the entity was a member at some earlier point during the testing period. Moreover, members of the EAG are determined by taking into account all transactions related to the acquisition even if they occur after the acquisition date. The final regulations also provide a new partnership look-through rule for determining members of the EAG, and coordinate this rule with the deemed corporation rule which has been retained from the 2012 temporary regulations.

The final regulations also include a modification to the anti-abuse rule in section 7874(c) by providing that any group assets, employees, or income associated with property transferred to an EAG that is part of a plan with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874 are not taken into account in both the numerator and the denominator of each of the substantial business activities tests. Under the temporary regulations, these items were not taken into account in the numerator, but were taken into account in the denominator.

In addition, the final regulations include certain modifications to the application of the specific tests used to determine whether the EAG has substantial business activities, for example whether individuals qualify as employees, when employee compensation is treated as incurred, how mobile assets are treated, and how group income is calculated.

The final regulations apply to acquisitions completed on or after June 3 2015.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington, DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm demonstrated its sweet spot of litigation with an international twist with the recent win for the Danish tax authority…but it’s not a tax case
The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Gift this article