US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service recently released final regulations addressing when a foreign corporation's expanded affiliated group (EAG) will be considered to have substantial business activities in a foreign country for purposes of determining whether the foreign corporation is a surrogate foreign corporation within the meaning of the section 7874 anti-inversion rules (TD 9720). The new regulations generally adopt temporary regulations that were issued in 2012 (TD 9592) with certain modifications. As general background, a foreign corporation will be treated as a surrogate foreign corporation with respect to a US corporation (and thus subject to the section 7874 anti-inversion rules) if pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions):

  • The foreign corporation acquires (directly or indirectly) substantially all of the assets of a US corporation;

  • After the acquisition, at least 60% of the stock of the foreign corporation is owned by former shareholders of the US corporation by reason of their prior ownership of stock in the US corporation; and

  • After the acquisition, the foreign corporation's EAG does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which the foreign corporation is organised.

The 2012 temporary regulations provided a bright-line test for determining whether a foreign corporation's EAG has substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country. Under this bright-line test, an EAG is considered to have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country only if at least 25% of the group employees, group assets, and group income are located or derived in the relevant foreign country. The final regulations retain this bright-line test, subject to certain modifications described below.

First, the final regulations clarify certain rules for determining the members of a foreign corporation's EAG by providing that an entity that is not a member of the EAG on the acquisition date is not a member of the EAG even if the entity was a member at some earlier point during the testing period. Moreover, members of the EAG are determined by taking into account all transactions related to the acquisition even if they occur after the acquisition date. The final regulations also provide a new partnership look-through rule for determining members of the EAG, and coordinate this rule with the deemed corporation rule which has been retained from the 2012 temporary regulations.

The final regulations also include a modification to the anti-abuse rule in section 7874(c) by providing that any group assets, employees, or income associated with property transferred to an EAG that is part of a plan with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874 are not taken into account in both the numerator and the denominator of each of the substantial business activities tests. Under the temporary regulations, these items were not taken into account in the numerator, but were taken into account in the denominator.

In addition, the final regulations include certain modifications to the application of the specific tests used to determine whether the EAG has substantial business activities, for example whether individuals qualify as employees, when employee compensation is treated as incurred, how mobile assets are treated, and how group income is calculated.

The final regulations apply to acquisitions completed on or after June 3 2015.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington, DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article