HMRC faces tough questions on tax evasion from UK government committee

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

HMRC faces tough questions on tax evasion from UK government committee

The UK tax authority, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will face questions from the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Wednesday afternoon.

HMRC will mainly be asked questions about HSBC, the ‘Lagarde list’ and its methods of dealing with tax evasion. The revenue authority has been criticised several times by PAC chair Margaret Hodge in the past few years.

“You are left wondering, as you see the enormity of what has been going on, what it actually takes to bring a tax cheat to court,” said Hodge today.

The summons comes as thousands of documents belonging to HSBC detailing how the bank’s Swiss operation helped customers avoid millions of pounds in tax were released by the ICIJ, the organisation behind November’s LuxLeaks exposé.

The documents were first seen by French police in 2007, and in 2010 were compiled into the confidential ‘Lagarde list’ – named after then-French finance minister Christine Lagarde – which was given to tax authorities around the world, including HMRC.

“We’ve known [about] this list of 7,000 UK residents who’ve had accounts in Switzerland since 2010,” Hodge told the BBC. “We know that these tax authorities have only pursued around 1,100; they’ve only got in £135 million, much less than other tax authorities across Europe, and they’ve only taken one person to court.”

The Lagarde list led to arrests in Argentina, Belgium, Greece, Spain and the US, causing several politicians to criticise HMRC and the government for not punishing offenders more severely in the UK.

Of the 6,800 UK-resident entities on the list, there was strong enough data to pursue around 3,400 individuals, companies, trusts and partnerships.

“HMRC has focused on taking civil action,” said financial secretary to the treasury David Gauke, defending the revenue authority. “Civil penalties can be very considerable: £135 million of tax, interest and penalties have been recovered.”

“There are large numbers of people who’ve had to pay the tax, pay interest on the tax and pay a penalty as a consequence of action HMRC has taken with that list.”

Due to the upcoming general election, Wednesday’s committee hearing will not be open to the public.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
The tax advisory firm becomes the latest member of the Andersen Global network, which has more than 50,000 professionals worldwide
A revised Chapter VII signals a move away from mechanical TP approaches, stressing transaction understanding, functional analysis and context-driven documentation requirements
HMRC’s growing focus on evidencing tax decisions is shifting attention from technical accuracy to governance, requiring businesses to demonstrate how positions were reached and documented
Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
Gift this article