HMRC faces tough questions on tax evasion from UK government committee

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

HMRC faces tough questions on tax evasion from UK government committee

The UK tax authority, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will face questions from the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Wednesday afternoon.

HMRC will mainly be asked questions about HSBC, the ‘Lagarde list’ and its methods of dealing with tax evasion. The revenue authority has been criticised several times by PAC chair Margaret Hodge in the past few years.

“You are left wondering, as you see the enormity of what has been going on, what it actually takes to bring a tax cheat to court,” said Hodge today.

The summons comes as thousands of documents belonging to HSBC detailing how the bank’s Swiss operation helped customers avoid millions of pounds in tax were released by the ICIJ, the organisation behind November’s LuxLeaks exposé.

The documents were first seen by French police in 2007, and in 2010 were compiled into the confidential ‘Lagarde list’ – named after then-French finance minister Christine Lagarde – which was given to tax authorities around the world, including HMRC.

“We’ve known [about] this list of 7,000 UK residents who’ve had accounts in Switzerland since 2010,” Hodge told the BBC. “We know that these tax authorities have only pursued around 1,100; they’ve only got in £135 million, much less than other tax authorities across Europe, and they’ve only taken one person to court.”

The Lagarde list led to arrests in Argentina, Belgium, Greece, Spain and the US, causing several politicians to criticise HMRC and the government for not punishing offenders more severely in the UK.

Of the 6,800 UK-resident entities on the list, there was strong enough data to pursue around 3,400 individuals, companies, trusts and partnerships.

“HMRC has focused on taking civil action,” said financial secretary to the treasury David Gauke, defending the revenue authority. “Civil penalties can be very considerable: £135 million of tax, interest and penalties have been recovered.”

“There are large numbers of people who’ve had to pay the tax, pay interest on the tax and pay a penalty as a consequence of action HMRC has taken with that list.”

Due to the upcoming general election, Wednesday’s committee hearing will not be open to the public.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article