Romania: Overview of 2015 investment incentives

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Overview of 2015 investment incentives

enache.jpg

Miruna Enache

In an attempt to summarise the efforts deployed by the Romanian authorities for encouraging investments, this overview covers state aid schemes and other incentives available to investors at the beginning of 2015.

State aid schemes

Two state aid schemes were implemented in 2014 and are now operational (with potential for additional grants being awarded in 2015):

  • State aid scheme ensuring sustainable economic development – Government Decision (GD) 807/2014; and

  • State aid scheme for investments promoting regional development (by means of creation of new jobs) – GD 332/2014.

Behind the langue de bois names of these state aid schemes are two grant initiatives financed by the Romanian government and aimed at supporting the initial investment performed by companies from various sectors. To access the grants, investors should file specific requests (including documents such as business plans) with the authorities and meet the conditions provided by the specific state aid legislation (for example, for the second scheme mentioned, more than 10 jobs are created as a result of the investment). Subsequently, investment characteristics are monitored by the authorities during the 'life' of the investment, to ensure that conditions are continuously met.

Under these grant schemes the Romanian state had funds of up to €100 million available in 2014. The funds available are split per country regions, as the state is looking to assist with a more evenly spread development of the country. As regards the amounts to be granted, each year they are included in the state budget and communicated to the public.

Tax incentives

In addition to the grants, the Romania introduced in the tax legislation several incentives available to all taxpayers with the same intention: to boost investment and business development.

For example, Romanian entities may avail of corporate tax incentives such as:

  • the tax exemption for profits reinvested in certain new non-current assets;

  • an additional deductible allowance of 50% for eligible expense related to R&D activities; and

  • a tax deferral related to the use of accelerated tax depreciation for specific categories of assets.

Other tax incentives available include:

  • Postponement of VAT for imported goods (VAT reverse-charge mechanism for import);

  • VAT exemption for imports of goods followed by intra-community supplies; and

  • Customs duties suspension procedure.

All these incentives follow specific rules and can result in a lower effective taxation of the business of Romanian entities.

Miruna Enache (miruna.enache@ro.ey.com)

EY Romania

Website: www.ey.com/ro

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article