International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy is reviewing the criteria to identify tax havens



Giuliano Foglia

Giovanni d’Ayala Valva

The Italian government is pressing ahead with a plan to attract foreign capital and investment. The idea is to make the Italian environment more appealing to investors through measures aimed at promoting economic growth. More specifically, certain measures have been recently approved (for example, the voluntary disclosure programme, patent box regime, research and development tax credit) and others should be introduced in the future either as part of the Investment Compact Bill or in the context of the so called Fiscal Delegation Law (which will, inter alia, review the Italian abuse of law regime, the tax avoidance discipline and introduce the new tax compliance scheme).

In this context, on December 22 2014, the Italian parliament approved the 2015 Stability Law, which, among others, set forth new criteria to identify blacklist countries, in order to confront a recurrent issue for companies working with foreign suppliers.

Indeed, the Italian income tax code requires for Italian entities an additional burden of proof to allow the deduction of costs (expenses and other negative income) deriving from transactions incurred with entities (or professionals) resident or located in certain countries identified in the so called blacklist.

In such respect, 2015 Stability Law revised the criteria to identify blacklist countries introducing as guiding principle the level of exchange of information between the third state and Italy (irrespective of the effective level of taxation in the third state).

Consequently, a new decree of the Minister of Finance will be issued in the near future to amend the previous blacklist, with the aim to delist all the countries that now have an adequate exchange of information with Italy.

In practical terms, such provision will simplify the relationship between Italy and commercial operators previously located in blacklisted countries which have an exchange of information clause in their treaty with Italy, such as Ecuador, Mauritius, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and United Arab Emirates. Hong Kong could also be removed from the blacklist once the relevant bilateral tax treaty is ratified by the Italian parliament.

The review of blacklist countries is consistent with the recent approach of the OECD to boost tax transparency and to promote automatic sharing of information between tax authorities. In this scenario, the Italian government is close to signing agreements with numerous blacklisted countries (for example, Switzerland) based on OECD standards which, on the one hand, will have the effect to intensify the exchange of data between tax authorities but, on the other hand, should also grant certain benefits for taxpayers in their relationship with the Italian tax authority.

Giuliano Foglia ( and Giovanni d'Ayala Valva (

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.