The Australian Tax Office has challenged the transfer pricing practices of BHP Billiton, serving the country’s largest taxpayer with a A$522 million ($432 million) tax bill, based on the pricing of goods it sold to a marketing affiliate in Singapore. The company’s Singapore tax bill is also being questioned under Australia’s controlled foreign company (CFC) rules, which require a minimum payment of tax.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms