Women in tax: The US perspective

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Women in tax: The US perspective

It's a good time to be a female tax lawyer in the United States. While, most certainly, more needs to be done, women have made significant progress in the US in recent years.

Two women have been commissioners of the IRS: Peggy Richardson and Shirley Peterson. Peggy was Commissioner for four years, and Shirley, following her tenure as Commissioner, has sat on a number of large corporate boards of directors. A third woman, Linda Stiff, also served as an acting IRS commissioner.

I remember the first time that I met Shirley. She was dressed in beautifully attractive clothes. It impressed me as a young female tax attorney to meet her. A woman could be both successful and beautifully dressed.

In the US Treasury Department, Danielle Rolfes serves as International Tax Counsel. In the IRS, two deputy associate chief counsels (international) are female, Anne Deveraux and Margie Rollinson, and two international branch chiefs, Elizabeth Karzon and Barbara Felker, are women. It wasn't long ago that Phyllis Marcus was also an international branch chief. These are talented, as well as important, people. Danielle and Barbara, for example, went to Harvard Law School.

There have also been notable and encouraging developments in the private practice of tax law. The California Bar Tax Section has had eight female chairs of the Tax Section, and the New York State Bar Tax Section has had five women serve as chair. Most of this happened in recent years.

More needs to be done in the tax world, however. The US Tax Court, which has 18 sitting judges, has only five female judges. These are impressive judges, indeed, but it would seem there should be more than only five women on the court. Judge Marvel, for example, recently wrote the court's opinion in one of the most significant decisions in recent years in the Tax Court, Altera v Commissioner. Altera involves an effort by the IRS to overrule an earlier decision in Xilinx v Commissioner, by issuing a new regulation. Judge Marvel, writing for a unanimous court, held that in this situation the IRS did not apply proper administrative review procedures and wrote a regulation that is contrary to the guiding arm's-length standard. While as a practitioner I was pleased to see that the taxpayer was successful in this important case, the more impressive thing to me was the understanding and intellect that went into the court's opinion. Judge Marvel did an excellent job.

A few years ago, I had a trial with Judge Cohen in Illinois Tool Works v Commissioner. She was the Tax Court's first female Chief Judge. At that time, there were only two other women on the court. While five female members of the court today suggests some improvement, I think there should be more.

I was at a dinner in New York last year and met Erika Nijenhuis, a senior tax partner with Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and a past chair of the NYS Bar Association Tax Section. It was great talking with her. It made me think of that term – dare I use it – "old boy's network," but there we were: two successful tax lawyers, female and beautifully feminine. Two judges spoke at the dinner, too. Both were female.

It is an exciting time for women tax lawyers in the US. Things have improved so much since the time of Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg and O'Connor who graduated with very high honours from law school but could not get jobs with a law firm because they were female. We've made great progress, but as I said above, more is needed to continue moving in the right direction and eradicate gender bias entirely.

fuller.jpg

Jennifer Fuller

Fenwick & West


more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article