Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

schanzle.jpg

birker.jpg

Dr Thomas Schänzle


Christian Birker

On September 26 2014, the Finance Ministry revised its comprehensive circular on the treatment of partnerships under the tax treaties. Of particular interest are its remarks on partners' interest costs incurred in connection with their partnership holdings. The fundamental principle behind the German computation of partnership income is that all income flowing to a partner is deemed to be part of that partner's profit share and thus does not reduce the partnership's profit as a business expense (loan interest, service fees and so on) and that all expenses incurred by a partner in respect of his investment or activities in the partnership are deductible from his share of the partnership income. This principle is reaffirmed by a treaty override provision in the Income Tax Act which applies unless the treaty explicitly states otherwise.

The revised circular now seems to be casting doubt on the continued application of the general principle, in particular in respect of loan interest incurred by a foreign partner. It states that such interest may only be deducted from the German source partnership income if it is effectively connected with that income. It then mentions the financing cost of an interest-free loan to the partnership as an example of a lack of the necessary connection. However, it is silent as to whether the same applies in cases where the partner's equity is refinanced.

Deduction of a partner's financing costs for the acquisition of a partnership share is a fundamental building block of many inbound partnership structures. Although it is and continues to be based on German partnership taxation principles, recourse to the courts may now be necessary.

Dr Thomas Schänzle (thomas.schaenzle@de.pwc.com) and Christian Birker (christian.birker@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477 and +49 69 9585 6061

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article