Bulgaria: Treaty analysis: Bulgaria and UK sign new double taxation agreement

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Treaty analysis: Bulgaria and UK sign new double taxation agreement

Varbanov-Petar

Petar Varbanov

On March 26 2015, the Republic of Bulgaria and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland signed a new Treaty for the Avoidance of Double Taxation (DTT) which will replace the DTT signed in 1987. The new treaty will introduce rules which differ considerably from the provisions now in force.

Scope of taxation

The existing taxes to which the new convention will apply are taxes on interest, royalties and gains from the transfer of shares and interests.

Taxation

Income derived by a resident of one contracting state situated in the other contracting state may be taxed in that other state. If the subject is considered a resident of both states, certain tie-breaker rules apply.

Pursuant to the new DTT, the source country may tax interest income, but if the beneficial owner of the interest is a resident of the other contracting state, such tax shall not exceed 5%. The same rule and withholding tax rate will apply to income from royalties. The new DTT introduces taxation of the gains acquired by a resident of one contracting state from the transfer of shares and comparable interests deriving more than 50% of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property situated in the other contracting state, in that other state (that is, where the property is situated). This rule does not apply to trading of shares on a stock exchange.

Double taxation and tax avoidance

Double taxation in Bulgaria will be eliminated through deducting an amount equal to the amount of tax paid on the respective income in the UK but not through exempting the income from taxation in Bulgaria.

Per the treaty, each of the contracting states will notify the other state of the completion of the procedures required by its law for the bringing into force of the DTT. The new DTT will enter into force on the date of the later of these notifications and will be effective from January 1 of the calendar year following that during which the DTT enters into force.

Petar Varbanov (petar.varbanov@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast

Tel: +359 2 988 69 75

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article