International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Tax treatment of exchange traded funds

thornton.jpg

tully.jpg

Gerry Thornton


Philip Tully

The Irish Revenue Commissioners recently published a guidance note to clarify their position on the tax treatment of Irish investors investing in exchange traded funds (ETFs) domiciled outside Ireland. In Table 1, we have summarised the relevant tax treatment that Revenue will apply. To give the full picture, we have also included the treatment of Irish domiciled ETFs. The Revenue guidance is solely focused on the tax treatment of investors that are Irish tax resident. The guidance is not relevant to non-Irish investors who hold units in Irish ETFs. The Irish tax treatment in respect of such non-Irish investors is clear; such investors are wholly exempt from Irish tax on their returns from Irish ETFs.

Table 1

Domicile of ETF

Tax treatment

1. Ireland

No exit tax. Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No social insurance (PRSI) or universal social charge (USC). Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset.

2. EU – UCITS

Taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (see above). Therefore, Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No PRSI or USC. Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset. This position has always been clear and follows specific legislative provisions.

3. EU – Non-UCITS

In most cases, taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (that is, 41% tax, no charge to PRSI or USC and losses ring-fenced). However, Revenue acknowledge that it is possible that some EU ETFs which are not UCITS may, because of their legal set-up, fall outside the 41% income tax regime and may instead be subject to normal capital gains tax (33%) and income tax rules (as described below). Revenue are willing to consider submissions on a case-by-case basis in this regard and acknowledge that taxpayers may decide to take such a position in appropriate cases.

4. Non-EU OECD (eg, US)

Generally, subject to normal capital gains tax and income tax rules. Therefore, marginal rate income tax (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable, on dividends received by Irish resident individuals and 33% capital gains on capital gains arising on the disposal of shares. Capital losses may generally be used to offset gains. Therefore, dividends will generally be taxed at a higher rate than European ETFs (1-3 above) but gains will generally be taxed at a lower rate.

5. Non-OECD (eg, Singapore)

Subject to a different tax treatment again. Both income and gains will generally be taxed at marginal income tax rate (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable.


Gerry Thornton
(gerry.thornton@matheson.com) and Philip Tully (philip.tully@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: + 353 1 232 2000

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.