Swiss Parliament ends intra-group dividend distributions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Swiss Parliament ends intra-group dividend distributions

intl-updates-small.jpg

Taxpayers will no longer face a 5% late payment interest on withholding tax payments that miss the 30-day filing deadline under new rules agreed upon by lawmakers.

stocker.jpg
kistler.jpg

Raoul Stocker

Jacques Kistler

By way of background, a Swiss corporation can fulfil its withholding tax liability by using a notification procedure to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration instead of remitting withholding tax. For intra-group dividends, the dividend notification procedure can be applied if the recipient of the dividend is a corporation and holds a qualifying participation in the Swiss corporation paying the dividends.

In 2011, the Swiss Supreme Court ruled that missing the 30-day filing deadline resulted in a forfeiture of the right to apply the notification procedure for qualifying intra-group dividends. Based on this decision the Swiss Federal Tax Administration levied a 5% late payment interest on the withholding tax liability if it was paid 30 days after the dividend due date) in cases where the deadline for the notification procedure was missed.

On September 30 2016, the Swiss Parliament agreed to amend the Swiss withholding tax law as follows:

  • If the respective requirements are met, the notification procedure for withholding tax on intra-group dividend distributions will apply, even if the 30-day filing deadline is missed;

  • The amended law applies retroactively, unless the statute of limitations on the tax liability/late payment interest has expired, or the tax liability/late payment interest were already finally assessed prior to January 1 2011;

  • Taxpayers who had to pay late payment interest for missing the 30-day deadline for the notification procedure can retroactively claim back the late payment interest if the respective requirements are met;

  • After the enactment of the new law, the taxpayer will have to make an official request to claim back the late payment interest within one year; and

  • Missing the 30-day filing deadline will in the future only lead to an administrative fine of up to CHF 5,000 ($5,000).

The law change will be subject to a possible referendum, which may be considered relatively unlikely, so that the new law could enter into force in early 2017.

The amended withholding tax law represents the best possible outcome for taxpayers because the law applies retroactively and allows late payment interest paid by taxpayers to be reclaimed.

While missing the 30-day deadline will no longer lead to a forfeiture of the notification procedure and there will no longer be 5% late payment interest, it is still important for taxpayers to meet the 30-day filing deadline for the notification procedure, so they comply with the law and to avoid possible fines.

Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch) and Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 279 6271 and +41 58 279 8164

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article