All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Tax havens: The Brazilian listing procedure and the recent list adjustment

brazil reais tax haven

Jurisdictions with nil, low, favourable and benefitted tax rules have played an important role in shaping today’s globalised environment, providing efficient structures and even permitting abusive and shamed transactions. To face this scenario, countries have imposed burdensome taxation for transactions involving tax havens, among other initiatives.

Brazil is no exception, and through a pack of laws enacted since 1996 it imposes burdensome rules for transfer pricing, thin capitalisation, gains and income of non-residents and profits of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs), with different concepts of tax havens.

Overcoming the lack of uniform features, tax havens are broadly divided in two main blocks: (a) favourable tax jurisdictions (FTJ), as the countries and dependencies that do not tax income or that tax income at a rate lower than 20% or where the legislation does not permit access on information about corporate interest position or ownership; and (b) privileged tax regimes (PTR), deemed to be those (i) that do not tax income or that tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20%; (ii) that provide tax advantage for their residents, without requiring development of substantial economic activities or restricting local substantial economic activities; (iii) that do not tax or tax non-territorial income at a maximum rate lower than 20%; or (iv) that do not permit access on information about corporate interest position, ownership of assets and rights or implemented economic transactions. For PTR purposes, the 20% can be modified by the authorities, which has been temporarily reduced to 17%.

With this rationale, since 1999 the Brazilian authorities have been refining a listing procedure for identifying FTJ and PTR, treating the list as exhaustive and convenient, even though legally speaking the list should be illustrative, mainly because the legal concepts are very broad and the laws have not entrusted a restrictive approach.

Not free of doubt, one may conclude that authorities could then change their position within the legal bounds. On September 14 2016, new modifications came to apply as of October 1 2016. Through Normative Instruction (NI) No. 1,658, the tax authorities have adjusted (a) the FTJ list to include Curacao, St Martin and Ireland and exclude the Netherlands Antilles and St. Kitts and Nevis and (b) the PTR list to include entities incorporated as holding companies in Austria.

In theory, such immediate application should be appropriate for changes within the laws, as the NI should only bring new interpretation for the legal concepts. However, the list should not be used retroactivity to claim for tax contingencies. Thus, even though the listing procedure chosen by Brazil to identify FTJ and PTR can permit future modifications, it should on the other hand grants comfort for taxpayers who rely on it to conduct their transactions.

This article was prepared by Andrea Bazzo Lauletta (, a partner at Mattos Filho, ITR's tax disputes correspondents in Brazil.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Several tax chiefs shared their administrations’ latest digital identity tracking systems and other tax technologies at the OECD’s annual meeting of authorities.
Businesses welcome the UK’s decision to scrap the IR35 reforms but are not happy about the time and money they have wasted to date.
Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree