All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Proposed changes to Ireland's Section 110 regime

Dail-Chamber 320 x 215 copyright

Obtaining a tax deduction on profits arising from Irish loan portfolios will get much harder for foreign investors under proposals unveiled by the government. A potential 25% tax could be charged on future profits related to financial assets.

Ireland’s Finance Minister Michael Noonan submitted proposals to parliament on September 6, amending Ireland’s Section 110 tax regime to charge tax on future profits arising for overseas investors in Irish loan portfolios.

Section 110

By way of background, the Section 110 tax regime includes favourable provisions for qualifying special purpose companies (SPCs) that hold and/or manage, or have an interest (including a partnership interest) in ‘qualifying assets’. In the case of plant and machinery acquired by the SPC, the regime applies to a business that is leasing that plant and machinery, e.g. aircraft and ships.

The provisions of Section 110 charge an Irish corporation tax rate of 25% to the SPC. However, critically, the return paid on certain profit dependent loans (PDLs) is tax deductible, which has resulted in modest levels of Irish corporation tax being payable by such companies. The use of such SPCs has made Ireland a key location for cross-border structured finance transactions.

The proposed changes

The proposed changes target the use of Section 110 companies holding and/or managing ‘specified mortgages’ including any activities that are ancillary to that business. 

For these purposes, a ‘specified mortgage’ means any financial asset e.g. a loan that derives its value or greater part of its value (directly or indirectly) from land in the Republic of Ireland. 

The proposed changes seek to treat the profits from the related business as a separate business and limit the availability of a profit dependent return so that it can only be tax deductible where the beneficiary of the PDLs are:

  1. Persons within the charge to Irish corporation tax;

  2. Irish pension funds and certain other Irish and European Union occupational schemes; or

  3. Persons resident for tax in an EU or European Economic Area (EEA) state (residence being determined under the laws of that state) and broadly:

(a) such person is generally subject to a tax on the profit dependent return;

(b) it is reasonable to conclude that the purpose or one of the main purposes of the profit participating note was                  not the avoidance of tax; and

(c) genuine economic activities are carried on by such person in the EU or EEA member state.

Importantly, normal commercial arms-length interest returns are not affected by the proposed changes and such arms-length interest should continue to be tax deductible by the Section 110 company.

The proposed changes take effect for profits arising from the specified mortgage business after September 6 2016.

Tax liability for foreign beneficiaries

Where the profit dependent return is not tax deductible, a tax charge of 25% would arise and without paying some form of Irish corporation tax or having genuine activities in an EU or EEA state, it appears that it will now be difficult for non-financial institutions to obtain a tax deduction for profit dependent returns on profits related to financial assets which derive their value or greater part of their value from Irish real estate.

Existing structures which use a Luxembourg, Malta, Irish qualifying investor alternative investment fund (QIAIF) or non-EU/EEA person as beneficiaries of the PDLs need to be examined as the proposed changes may trigger mitigation and/or mandatory repayment clauses in the underlying PDL agreement or related financing agreements.

Dail-Chamber 320 x 215 copyright

Source: Houses of the Oireachtas

At this stage, the amendment is only proposed by the finance minister and remains subject to approval by the Dáil Éireann (the Irish parliament). However, it is expected that this amendment (or a variation of it) will soon be passed into law when the next Finance Bill is passed after the Irish Budget.

This article was prepared by Mason Hayes & Curran, International Tax Review’s correspondents in Ireland. For further information, please contact Robert Henson:


Robert Henson 100

Robert Henson, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 2314
E: rhenson@mhc.ie
caption

Jean Scally 100 x 143

Jean Scally, tax senior associate.
T: +353 1 614 5284
E: jscally@mhc.ie
caption

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree