Germany: Domestic tax law provisions and Brexit

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Domestic tax law provisions and Brexit

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

German companies need to rely on EU law to distribute dividends to UK parent companies free of withholding tax. One obvious consequence of the Brexit would be that EU law, such as the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, would no longer apply. For German entities, this would mean increased withholding tax on dividends paid to UK holding entities since the Germany-UK tax treaty only reduces the rate to 5%.

It should also be noted that German domestic tax law includes references to EU and European Economic Area (EEA) residence. For example, UK subsidiaries earning interest income would potentially be subject to German controlled foreign company (CFC) rules post-Brexit, while they could rely on a substance-test exemption from the rules as long as they are an EU/EEA resident.

Dividends received from UK subsidiaries by German entities will also have to meet certain criteria regarding the activities of the distributing entity to qualify for the dividend exemption from German trade tax. Certain restructurings, such as a hive-down of a German branch of a UK entity into a subsidiary would no longer qualify for rollover relief post-Brexit. There are discussions around potential violations of certain lock-in periods by the mere fact that UK would cease to be an EU member state, e.g. where exit taxes have been deferred in the past, or for a hive-down with a UK entity contributing a branch relying on the rollover relief.

Although the UK will not depart the EU immediately as a result of the June 23 2016 vote to leave the EU, political discussions suggest that the notification to leave under Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union will be delivered in early 2017. This would trigger a negotiation period of two years, after which (unless extended based on unanimous consent of all EU member states) the UK would be independent of the EU. Taxpayers will need to monitor developments and the negotiations after Article 50 has been triggered by the UK. The developments could potentially require companies to amend existing structures within the two-year period to be prepared for the post-Brexit world.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier for them than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Taylor Wessing, whose most recent UK revenues were £283.7m, would become part of a £1.23bn firm post combination
China and a clutch of EU nations have voiced dissent after Estonia shot down the US side-by-side deal; in other news, HMRC has awarded companies contracts to help close the tax gap
An EY survey of almost 2,000 tax leaders also found that only 49% of respondents feel ‘highly prepared’ to manage an anticipated surge of disputes
Gift this article