Switzerland: Swiss parliament approves Corporate Tax Reform III
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss parliament approves Corporate Tax Reform III

kistler.jpg
zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler

Rene Zulauf

The Swiss parliament approved Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) on June 17 2016. The main objectives of the reform are to align Swiss tax law with international standards and to enhance Switzerland's attractiveness as a location for multinational enterprises.

The reform would phase out all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the Swiss finance branch regime. Federal and cantonal tax holidays would not be affected by the reform and would continue to be granted.

A number of measures are included in the legislation on CTR III to compensate for the elimination of the beneficial tax regimes:

  • Reduction of the headline tax rates at the discretion of cantons, so that many more Swiss cantons could be in the 12 – 14% range for their effective combined federal/cantonal/communal tax rates (ETR);

  • Introduction of a patent box regime, which is mandatory for all cantons and applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the R&D spend is occurred in Switzerland. The measure is in line Action 5 of the OECD BEPS plan on the modified nexus approach;

  • Introduction of R&D incentives, offering excess R&D deductions of 150% on qualifying expenditure, at the discretion of cantons;

  • Allowance of a step-up (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company, or of additional activities and functions, to Switzerland;

  • Allowance of the tax-privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation during a period of five years;

  • Introduction of a notional interest deduction (NID) regime at the federal level and at the discretion of individual cantons at a cantonal/communal level. Cantons that opt to introduce a NID on equity would be required to tax at a cantonal/communal level at least 60% of the dividend income received by individuals from qualifying participations of at least 10%, under the partial taxation regime for dividends; and

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal annual net wealth tax in relation to the holding of participations, patented IP and inter-company loans at the discretion of cantons.

The combined tax reduction available through the patent box, the release of hidden reserves, the R&D super deduction and NID would be limited to 80% of the cantonal/communal taxes.

The CTR III should help to attract more multinationals to Switzerland, as well as to keep existing multinationals in the country. The legislation would introduce a competitive corporate tax regime that is internationally accepted and fully takes into account the requirements of the OECD BEPS agenda.

There will likely will be a referendum and national vote on the legislation. The most likely date for the law to become effective would be January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
In the wake of the global rankings release, we focus on the top performers across EMEA in the second of three regional analyses
Gift this article