International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: Serbia clarifies registration of foreign entities for VAT purposes

Rafailovic

Aleksandra Rafailovic

On May 23, 2016, the Serbian Ministry of Finance announced its clarifying opinion on the tax representation of a non-resident entity for the purpose of implementing the Law on Value Added Tax and the obligation to register for VAT.

Although the concept of tax representatives for non-residents existed in previous versions of the VAT Law, the latest amendments to the Act, adopted in October 2015, define conditions that VAT representatives should fulfill. It also allows non-residents providing goods and services in the Republic of Serbia to register for VAT via a proxy. Instructions on the process of registration were further described in the opinion issued by the finance ministry on May 23.

The criteria that tax representatives must fulfil includes mandatory registration in Serbia, having a VAT taxpayer status for at least the last 12 months, no tax arrears, and no convictions for a criminal tax offense. The decision on eligibility is issued by the Tax Administration within 15 days after completing the VAT representative registration process on the tax authority's website.

Today, only a limited number of companies are registered as VAT tax representatives for foreign entities. This is most likely because of the joint and severe responsibility for all obligations of the foreign entity that arises for VAT representatives. In addition, even though the rulebook and opinion explain most of topics, some practical aspects are still left unclear – including details about procedures for payments and VAT refunds.

Having all this in mind and considering that registration is not mandatory, but rather on a voluntary basis, it remains to be seen whether this new facility will be increasingly used by non-resident entities and their resident associates, or whether the VAT burden will remain with the domestic recipients of goods and services.

Aleksandra Rafailovic (aleksandra.rafailovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast, Serbia Office

Tel: +381 11 3241 484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.