International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: GAAR comes into force in Poland


Justyna Bauta-Szostak

The Act introducing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule ("GAAR") in Poland enters into force on July 15 2016.

The most important feature of GAAR is the right given to the Ministry of Finance to deny, in tax computations, an artificial arrangement (or series of arrangements) with tax savings as its principal purpose if the tax savings are not compliant, under the circumstances of the case, with the provisions and purpose of tax laws.

Arrangements investigated under GAAR will be compared to arrangements that could be made by a reasonable taxpayer following fair market goals. These comparative arrangements will form the basis to assess the tax consequences for a taxpayer.

GAAR will be applicable to tax savings achieved after its effective date, regardless of the actual moment of the transaction.

It means that GAAR may be used retroactively with regard to undertakings or arrangements that were made before its introduction, but the effects of which extend to the present day (e.g. a tax loss generated through past events that is settled in present tax returns, or depreciation write-offs regarding assets acquired in the past).

Taking the above into consideration, all arrangements that result in ongoing tax savings, including those made before the introduction of GAAR, must be thoroughly reviewed in the context of GAAR.

It is important to note that tax-saving arrangements, if deemed artificial by the Ministry of Finance, may no longer be protected by ordinary tax rulings.

A taxpayer concerned with GAAR may request for a special safeguarding tax ruling from the Ministry of Finance. The ruling will be issued within six months. The fee for one ruling is approximately €5,000 ($5,500). The ruling is binding for the tax authorities. However, the ruling may be changed by the Ministry of Finance if it conflicts with the verdicts of the Constitutional Tribunal or the European Court of Justice.

The following arrangements may be considered as artificial (which does not exclude other arrangements from possible investigation under GAAR):

  • Operations unreasonably divided;

  • Intermediaries unreasonably involved;

  • Transactions resulting in a situation similar to the one prior to the arrangement (looping);

  • Transactions consisting of mutually nullifying or compensating elements; or

  • Arrangements connected with a business risk exceeding the expected benefits (other than tax savings) to the extent that one must consider a reasonably acting person not to have chosen this course of action.

GAAR will be applicable to tax savings exceeding approximately €25,000.

GAAR shall not be applicable to VAT, but by virtue of a special, separate provision, the GAAR will be extended to VAT issues under the rule of law abuse, enabling tax authorities to deny VAT effects of artificial arrangements.

Justyna Bauta-Szostak (

Michalik Dłuska Dziedzic & Partners

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.