Brazil: Computer software included in the concept of copyrights for the purposes of the double tax convention between Brazil and Finland
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Computer software included in the concept of copyrights for the purposes of the double tax convention between Brazil and Finland

chin.jpg
gottberg.jpg

Michela Chin

Ruben Gottberg

The Brazilian Federal Revenue (RFB) has issued tax ruling COSIT n. 4/2016, allowing the application of a 10% withholding tax (WHT) rate on payments for the use of computer software as provided by the double tax treaty (DTT) between Brazil and Finland.

By way of background, under the DTTs Brazil has in place with both Finland and France, taxation on royalties at source is limited as follows:

  • 10% on the royalties which refer to copyright;

  • 25% on royalties which refer to industry and commercial trademark use; and

  • 15% on royalties that do not qualify as either (a) or (b).

Although the provisions contained in both DTTs are similar, the RFB has expressed different positions in the past. Under tax ruling n. 52/2007, the RFB determined that payments for the use of computer software were subject to 15% WHT (as provided by the DTT between Brazil and Finland) whereas under tax ruling n. 262/2003, the position was that such payments were subject to 10% WHT (as provided by the DTT between Brazil and France).

Now, tax ruling COSIT n. 4/2016, issued on May 13 2016, solves the divergence by clarifying that licenses for computer software should be included in the concept of copyright licenses and that a 10% WHT rate should apply on payments for the use of computer software under the DTT between Brazil and Finland.

Brazilian tax authorities release a public consultation on the understanding of significant economic activities

The Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) have released Public Consultation n. 007/2016 expressing their initial understanding on what should be viewed as "significant economic activities" for the purpose of article 2 of Normative Instruction n. 1,037/2010.

The Normative Instruction provides a list of low-tax and privileged tax regime jurisdictions from a Brazilian tax perspective.

As per the content of the Consultation, released on May 30 2016, holding companies with significant economic activity should be those having, in its domicile, operational capacity to manage the group. That is, the holding company should have the ability to decide how to manage its assets and investments. Operational capacity should be tested by the existence of a fixed place (i.e. physical place of business) as well as having qualified employees to effectively manage the group.

According to the consultation, Brazilian taxpayers had until June 10 2016 to provide comments on this subject before the enactment of the Normative Instruction by the RFB.

Multinationals are encouraged to monitor the progress of this consultation and to analyse how this will impact their specific structures.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Ruben Gottberg (ruben.gottberg@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
In the wake of the global rankings release, we focus on the top performers across EMEA in the second of three regional analyses
Gift this article