EU Anti-Avoidance Directive and Irish Holding Companies – Taxation of Dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Anti-Avoidance Directive and Irish Holding Companies – Taxation of Dividends

The hastily adopted EU Anti-Avoidance Directive ("Directive") requires European Union (EU) member states to introduce or amend their existing Controlled Foreign Companies ("CFC") legislation.

Unlike many EU countries, Ireland taxes dividends at either a 12.5% or 25% corporation tax rate and operates a wide-ranging credit system for double tax relief. Ireland taxes dividends as an alternative to having a CFC regime. With the BREXIT vote decided and the UK expected to highlight the benefit of the UK as a holding company location which exempts dividends, the Irish may change their tax regime.

Under the Directive, Ireland is required to introduce CFC law by December 31 2018, which is to take effect from January 1 2019. While Ireland has amended its tax code to ensure dividends can flow tax-free between EU companies by way of a deemed tax credit, the requirement to introduce a CFC regime increases the pressure on the Irish Department of Finance to introduce law to exempt dividends from tax.

With the new Irish coalition government beginning to get to grips with its work, it should be fair to expect the Irish Department of Finance to at least consider over the summer the possibility of introducing legislation to exempt foreign dividends received by Irish holding companies. Such a move would be welcome and could considerably enhance the attraction of Ireland as a holding company location.

This article was prepared by Mason Hayes & Curran, International Tax Review’s correspondents in Ireland. For further information, please contact:

John Gulliver 100

John Gulliver, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 5007
E: jgulliver@mhc.ie

Robert Henson 100

Robert Henson, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 2314
E: rhenson@mhc.ie

Maureeen 100

Maura Dineen, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 2444
E: mdineen@mhc.ie

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Gift this article