Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules apply to CFCs earning passive income that is taxed at a rate of less than 25%. However, the rules do not apply to subsidiaries located in the EU/EEA if the Germany taxpayer can demonstrate that the subsidiary carries on a genuine economic activity in its state of residence (Cadbury-Schweppes exception, see ECJ, C-196/04). There is scant case law on what constitutes a genuine economic activity for these purposes.

In a recent case before the Lower Fiscal Court of Münster, a Cyprus-resident subsidiary of a German parent company had office space available and one resident employee in Cyprus. The Cyprus entity was engaged in the acquisition of publishing rights for Russian and Ukrainian books; the authors contracted with the Cyprus entity, which then granted an intercompany licence for an arm's-length royalty paid to group subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine. There was contact between the authors and the publishing group through the local subsidiaries, but the authors contracted only with the Cyprus entity. The royalties were considered passive income and were benefited from low taxation in Cyprus.

The Münster court held that interposing the Cyprus entity to receive the royalties paid by the Russian and Ukrainian subsidiaries instead of the German parent constituted a wholly artificial arrangement because the entity did not conduct a genuine economic activity in Cyprus. The court held that the entity did not use the local resources and the German taxpayer failed to present sufficient business reasons why the licensing activities had to be performed in Cyprus (rather than Germany). Some of the court's conclusions regarding the scope of the EU freedom of establishment and the impact of outsourcing seem questionable. As the decision was appealed, the Federal Tax Court will have the final say on the issue (pending case reference I R 94/15).

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de); and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article