Independent review of Ireland's corporate tax code

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Independent review of Ireland's corporate tax code

Ireland Pic 320 x 215

An independent review of Ireland’s corporate tax regime highlighted some important considerations. John Gulliver and Niamh Keogh discuss the key points.

Niamh Keogh MCH

Niamh Keogh, of counselT: +353 1 614 5000E: nkeogh@mhc.ie

 

John Gulliver 90 x 100

John Gulliver, tax partnerT: +353 1 614 5007E: jgulliver@mhc.ie

The Irish Department of Finance published Seamus Coffey’s ‘Review of Ireland’s Corporate Tax Code’ on September 12 2017. The terms of reference of the review excluded any consideration of changing the 12.5% corporation tax rate for Irish tax resident companies or non-resident companies carrying on a trade in Ireland from a branch or agency. This is in line with the pledge of successive Irish governments to international investors that the 12.5% rate will remain a permanent feature of the Irish corporate tax code, and Ireland will defend any attempt by the EU to remove Ireland’s exclusive right to determine the tax rate applying to companies trading in Ireland.

Whilst the review highlights that the Irish corporate tax code is transparent and competitive, the review highlights the consideration that needs to be given to some extension of Ireland’s transfer pricing code by 2020. For large groups operating across multiple jurisdictions the key areas are as follows:

  • Under current Irish transfer pricing law “any agreement or arrangement of any kind (whether or not it is, or is intended to be legally enforceable) the terms of which were agreed before July 1 2010 is outside the scope of Ireland’s transfer pricing regime. Coffey has suggested consideration be given to ending this grandfathering.

  • The current Irish transfer pricing regime applies only to arrangements involving the supply and acquisition of goods, services, money or intangible assets between certain associated persons where the consideration payable or receivable falls to be taken into account for tax as profits of a trade carried on in Ireland of large groups (i.e. transactions that are subject to tax at 12.5%). Coffey has suggested consideration be given to Ireland extending its transfer pricing regime to non-trading transactions and capital transactions. Whilst the Irish gains tax code already has deemed market value rules for disposals of assets, it does not extend tax to the disposal of liabilities or indeed corporates’ capital maintenance arrangements. Any changes could impact structures that use Irish interest free loans between associated companies, debt equity ratios on inward investment and back–to-back royalty arrangements.

  • The report recommends that Irish transfer pricing should be updated for the latest 2017 OECD Guidelines on transfer pricing. Currently, Irish transfer pricing takes guidance from the OECD transfer pricing guidelines dated July 13 1995 as supplemented by the OECD report dated April 11 1996 on intangible property and services and the OECD report dated July 24 1997 on cost contribution arrangements and as modified by the 2010 update.

The report recommends a consultation period in advance of the introduction of any changes.

This article was prepared by Mason Hayes & Curran, International Tax Review’s correspondents in Ireland. 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article