Mexico targets financial institutions for highest withholding tax rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico targets financial institutions for highest withholding tax rate

LOGO RITCH MUELLER 320 x 215

The Mexican tax authorities are making every effort to claim the highest withholding tax rate on interest paid by financial companies in transactions with related persons.

rm200.jpg

The tax authorities issued an internal criterion through which they intend to disallow the application of the reduced 4.9% withholding tax rate on interest paid by Mexican non-regulated financial companies (commonly known as SOFOMs as per their Spanish acronym), when interest payments are made to non-Mexican “related persons”. Even if such a position overrides Article 166 of the Mexican Income Tax Law (MITL), the Mexican authorities’ intention is to collect 35% of the gross interest paid by SOFOMs.

In general terms, Article 166 states that the 4.9% withholding tax rate applies to Mexican source interest when it is:

  • Derived from securities listed in the Mexican Stock Exchange;

  • Paid by Mexican banks and SOFOMs;

  • Received by foreign banks (applicable under Transitory Article 2-VI of the MITL in force as of 2017); and

  • Derived from securities listed by a Mexican resident in a country with a double tax treaty with Mexico.

It is worth mentioning that interest paid and received by banks and SOFOMs may come from all sorts of financial instruments, including securities and plain vanilla loans.

Article 166 also establishes that the 4.9% rate should not be applicable if the beneficial owners, directly or indirectly, individually or together with other “related persons”, receive more than 5% of the interest derived from “a specific security”, and are:

  • Shareholders of more than 10% of the voting shares of the issuer; or

  • A legal entity that is owned by the issuer who holds more than 20% of the legal entity.

The term “related persons” is broader than “related parties” as it covers any business link between two persons, any common interest between two persons, and any relationship with a third party that has a business link with two persons that have a business link or common interest. This comprehensive definition may convert many third party transactions into transactions subject to the highest withholding tax rate applicable to Mexican source interest.  

The application of the 4.9% withholding tax rate was only limited in transactions carried out between “related persons” when dealing with securities issued by a Mexican resident entity, which may include SOFOMs. However, based on what the tax authorities called a “harmonic interpretation of the tax law”, in the recently published internal criterion 64/ISR/N,it is concluded that in the case of SOFOMs, these restrictions apply not only to securities but also to other kinds of financial instruments or loans.

Internal criteria issued by the Mexican tax authorities is not binding for taxpayers. Nevertheless, it should be observed by officials during tax audits. Therefore, transactions executed with Mexican SOFOMs should be carefully analysed to make a risk analysis in case of a possible dispute, and evaluate if other Mexican tax formalities have been properly fulfilled in order to have a strong defence case (e.g. electronic invoicing, informative returns, back-to-back or dividend characterisation rules, thin capitalisation and transfer pricing).

It would also be relevant to consider that this internal criterion was issued in connection with interest paid by SOFOMs. However, the same position should be applicable to payments made by Mexican banks as they are regulated under the same subsections and paragraphs of Article 166.

This article was written by Oscar A. López Velarde of Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, SC.

Oscar A. López Velarde (olopezvelarde@ritch.com.mx)

Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, S.C.

www.ritch.com.mx

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Countries which care about fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
The plan aims to improve the efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness of direct tax administration in India
Meanwhile, South Africa’s finance minister has accepted a court decision on suspending a VAT increase and US President Donald Trump mulls a 100% tariff on foreign films
Jaime Carey speaks about the benefits of his tax background, DEI values, the use of AI for a smarter legal practice, and other priorities that will define his presidency
Historically low levels of attrition over consecutive years made a ‘difficult decision’ necessary, PwC has reportedly said
WTS Global is also vetting new potential member firms in Algeria, Cote D’Ivoire and Benin, Kelly Mgbor tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The scope of qualifying pillar two tax credits could reportedly be broadened; in other news, hundreds of IRS appeals staff are to resign
For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
Gift this article