International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico targets financial institutions for highest withholding tax rate


The Mexican tax authorities are making every effort to claim the highest withholding tax rate on interest paid by financial companies in transactions with related persons.


The tax authorities issued an internal criterion through which they intend to disallow the application of the reduced 4.9% withholding tax rate on interest paid by Mexican non-regulated financial companies (commonly known as SOFOMs as per their Spanish acronym), when interest payments are made to non-Mexican “related persons”. Even if such a position overrides Article 166 of the Mexican Income Tax Law (MITL), the Mexican authorities’ intention is to collect 35% of the gross interest paid by SOFOMs.

In general terms, Article 166 states that the 4.9% withholding tax rate applies to Mexican source interest when it is:

  • Derived from securities listed in the Mexican Stock Exchange;

  • Paid by Mexican banks and SOFOMs;

  • Received by foreign banks (applicable under Transitory Article 2-VI of the MITL in force as of 2017); and

  • Derived from securities listed by a Mexican resident in a country with a double tax treaty with Mexico.

It is worth mentioning that interest paid and received by banks and SOFOMs may come from all sorts of financial instruments, including securities and plain vanilla loans.

Article 166 also establishes that the 4.9% rate should not be applicable if the beneficial owners, directly or indirectly, individually or together with other “related persons”, receive more than 5% of the interest derived from “a specific security”, and are:

  • Shareholders of more than 10% of the voting shares of the issuer; or

  • A legal entity that is owned by the issuer who holds more than 20% of the legal entity.

The term “related persons” is broader than “related parties” as it covers any business link between two persons, any common interest between two persons, and any relationship with a third party that has a business link with two persons that have a business link or common interest. This comprehensive definition may convert many third party transactions into transactions subject to the highest withholding tax rate applicable to Mexican source interest.  

The application of the 4.9% withholding tax rate was only limited in transactions carried out between “related persons” when dealing with securities issued by a Mexican resident entity, which may include SOFOMs. However, based on what the tax authorities called a “harmonic interpretation of the tax law”, in the recently published internal criterion 64/ISR/N,it is concluded that in the case of SOFOMs, these restrictions apply not only to securities but also to other kinds of financial instruments or loans.

Internal criteria issued by the Mexican tax authorities is not binding for taxpayers. Nevertheless, it should be observed by officials during tax audits. Therefore, transactions executed with Mexican SOFOMs should be carefully analysed to make a risk analysis in case of a possible dispute, and evaluate if other Mexican tax formalities have been properly fulfilled in order to have a strong defence case (e.g. electronic invoicing, informative returns, back-to-back or dividend characterisation rules, thin capitalisation and transfer pricing).

It would also be relevant to consider that this internal criterion was issued in connection with interest paid by SOFOMs. However, the same position should be applicable to payments made by Mexican banks as they are regulated under the same subsections and paragraphs of Article 166.

This article was written by Oscar A. López Velarde of Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, SC.

Oscar A. López Velarde (

Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, S.C.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum heard that Italy’s VAT investigation into Meta has the potential to set new and expensive tax principles that would likely be adopted around the world
Police are now investigating the leak of confidential tax information by a former PwC partner at the request of the Australian government.
A VAT policy officer at the European Commission told the forum that the initial deadline set for EU convergence of domestic digital VAT reporting is likely to be extended.
The UK government shows little sign of cutting corporate tax, while a growing number of businesses report a decline in investment as a result of the higher tax burden.
Mariana Morais Teixeira of Morais Leitão overviews Portugal’s new tax incentive regime designed to boost the country’s capital-depleted private sector.
Septian Fachrizal, TP analyst at the Directorate General of Taxes, outlines how Indonesia is relying heavily on the successful implementation of pillar one.