International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: US final regulations - goodwill, going-concern value transferred to foreign corporations


Sean Foley

Cameron Taheri

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service on December 15 2016 released for publication in the Federal Register final regulations (T.D. 9803), addressing the tax treatment of transfers by US persons of property – including goodwill and going-concern value – to foreign corporations in non-recognition transactions pursuant to Section 367. These regulations finalise those that were proposed in September 2015 and withdraw temporary regulations that date back from 1986.

Despite significant criticisms having been levelled against the proposed regulations in public comments, the final regulations adopt, with minor changes, the proposed regulations. The preamble to the final regulations consists primarily of the government’s response to those comments in an attempt to justify the retention of the rules from the proposed regulations.


The 2015 proposed regulations concerned “United States persons” that transfer certain property – including foreign goodwill and going-concern value – to foreign corporations in non-recognition transactions described in Section 367. As a justification for the revised approach to foreign goodwill and going-concern value, the preamble to the proposed regulations alluded to Treasury and IRS concerns that some taxpayers may be undervaluing Section 936(h)(3)(B) intangibles, along with overvaluing the amount treated as non-taxable foreign goodwill.

Broadly speaking, the proposed regulations excluded intangible property from the exception for gain recognition under Section 367(a)(3) otherwise available to property in an active trade or business outside the US. Under the proposed regulations – at the taxpayer’s election – transfers of intangible property (with certain exceptions but including goodwill and going-concern value) would be taxed under the Section 367(d) deemed royalty regime, even if the taxpayer takes the position that the property is not Section 936(h)(3)(B) property.

The proposed regulations also eliminated the deemed 20-year maximum useful life of property for purposes of inclusions under Section 367(d), and instead the useful life would be the entire period during which the exploitation of the intangible property is anticipated to occur, as of the time of the transfer.

Final regulations

The final regulations describe in detail the legislative history and the treatment by taxpayers of goodwill and going-concern value under the rules of Section 367.

Overall, the final regulations, consistent with the proposed regulations, eliminate the favourable treatment of foreign goodwill and going-concern value from the 1986 temporary regulations. The preamble consists primarily of the Treasury’s and IRS’s observations on policy issues involved and their views that such considerations justify the elimination of the favourable treatment.

Specifically, the final regulations do not provide a special exemption to continue the favourable treatment of foreign goodwill and going-concern value and do not expand the types of assets that are eligible for the active trade or business exception pursuant to Section 367. Not only do the final regulations retain the general approach of the proposed regulations, but they also reject a number of exceptions to the new rule suggested by commenters. Among such suggestions were an exception for or based on:

  • Incorporations as a result of foreign legal or regulatory compulsion or pressure;

  • Professional service businesses;

  • Foreign goodwill and going-concern value that is not associated with any highly valuable Section 936 intangibles;

  • Allowing the tax-free transfer of intangibles up to a value derived from a formula based on expenses; or

  • Information reported to a foreign country’s tax authority.

According to the preamble, none of the approaches for more directly valuing foreign goodwill and going-concern value offered a “principled and administrable basis” for allocating value or otherwise distinguishing between transactions that pose a “potential of tax avoidance” and those that do not.

With respect to the 20-year limitation on useful life, the final regulations provide that taxpayers may – in the year of transfer – elect to take into account Section 367(d) inclusions only during the 20-year period, beginning with the first year in which the US transferor takes into account income under Section 367(d). This optional limitation, however, is not to affect the present value of all amounts included by the taxpayer under Section 367(d).

The final regulations also revise the definition of the term “useful life” to provide that this includes the entire period during which exploitation of the transferred intangible property is reasonably anticipated to affect the determination of taxable income, including use in the development of other intangible property and any exploitation of that other developed intangible property.

Effective date

The final regulations retain the effective date that the rules apply to transfers occurring on or after September 14 2015 (related to the release of the proposed regulations).

Accordingly, the final regulations generally apply to transfers occurring on or after September 14 2015 and to transfers occurring before that date, resulting from entity classification elections that were filed on or after September 14 2015.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

Sean Foley ( and Cameron Taheri (, Washington, DC

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 533 3384


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.