US Outbound: US final regulations - goodwill, going-concern value transferred to foreign corporations
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: US final regulations - goodwill, going-concern value transferred to foreign corporations


Sean Foley

Cameron Taheri

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service on December 15 2016 released for publication in the Federal Register final regulations (T.D. 9803), addressing the tax treatment of transfers by US persons of property – including goodwill and going-concern value – to foreign corporations in non-recognition transactions pursuant to Section 367. These regulations finalise those that were proposed in September 2015 and withdraw temporary regulations that date back from 1986.

Despite significant criticisms having been levelled against the proposed regulations in public comments, the final regulations adopt, with minor changes, the proposed regulations. The preamble to the final regulations consists primarily of the government’s response to those comments in an attempt to justify the retention of the rules from the proposed regulations.


The 2015 proposed regulations concerned “United States persons” that transfer certain property – including foreign goodwill and going-concern value – to foreign corporations in non-recognition transactions described in Section 367. As a justification for the revised approach to foreign goodwill and going-concern value, the preamble to the proposed regulations alluded to Treasury and IRS concerns that some taxpayers may be undervaluing Section 936(h)(3)(B) intangibles, along with overvaluing the amount treated as non-taxable foreign goodwill.

Broadly speaking, the proposed regulations excluded intangible property from the exception for gain recognition under Section 367(a)(3) otherwise available to property in an active trade or business outside the US. Under the proposed regulations – at the taxpayer’s election – transfers of intangible property (with certain exceptions but including goodwill and going-concern value) would be taxed under the Section 367(d) deemed royalty regime, even if the taxpayer takes the position that the property is not Section 936(h)(3)(B) property.

The proposed regulations also eliminated the deemed 20-year maximum useful life of property for purposes of inclusions under Section 367(d), and instead the useful life would be the entire period during which the exploitation of the intangible property is anticipated to occur, as of the time of the transfer.

Final regulations

The final regulations describe in detail the legislative history and the treatment by taxpayers of goodwill and going-concern value under the rules of Section 367.

Overall, the final regulations, consistent with the proposed regulations, eliminate the favourable treatment of foreign goodwill and going-concern value from the 1986 temporary regulations. The preamble consists primarily of the Treasury’s and IRS’s observations on policy issues involved and their views that such considerations justify the elimination of the favourable treatment.

Specifically, the final regulations do not provide a special exemption to continue the favourable treatment of foreign goodwill and going-concern value and do not expand the types of assets that are eligible for the active trade or business exception pursuant to Section 367. Not only do the final regulations retain the general approach of the proposed regulations, but they also reject a number of exceptions to the new rule suggested by commenters. Among such suggestions were an exception for or based on:

  • Incorporations as a result of foreign legal or regulatory compulsion or pressure;

  • Professional service businesses;

  • Foreign goodwill and going-concern value that is not associated with any highly valuable Section 936 intangibles;

  • Allowing the tax-free transfer of intangibles up to a value derived from a formula based on expenses; or

  • Information reported to a foreign country’s tax authority.

According to the preamble, none of the approaches for more directly valuing foreign goodwill and going-concern value offered a “principled and administrable basis” for allocating value or otherwise distinguishing between transactions that pose a “potential of tax avoidance” and those that do not.

With respect to the 20-year limitation on useful life, the final regulations provide that taxpayers may – in the year of transfer – elect to take into account Section 367(d) inclusions only during the 20-year period, beginning with the first year in which the US transferor takes into account income under Section 367(d). This optional limitation, however, is not to affect the present value of all amounts included by the taxpayer under Section 367(d).

The final regulations also revise the definition of the term “useful life” to provide that this includes the entire period during which exploitation of the transferred intangible property is reasonably anticipated to affect the determination of taxable income, including use in the development of other intangible property and any exploitation of that other developed intangible property.

Effective date

The final regulations retain the effective date that the rules apply to transfers occurring on or after September 14 2015 (related to the release of the proposed regulations).

Accordingly, the final regulations generally apply to transfers occurring on or after September 14 2015 and to transfers occurring before that date, resulting from entity classification elections that were filed on or after September 14 2015.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

Sean Foley ( and Cameron Taheri (, Washington, DC

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 533 3384


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article