Malta: Alternative trading platforms – taxation of capital gains update

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Alternative trading platforms – taxation of capital gains update

intl-updates

Towards the end of 2017, Malta's capital gains rules (subsidiary legislation 123.27 to the Income Tax Act, Cap 123 of the laws of Malta) were amended and now include a specific rule relating to the taxation of capital gains derived by an original shareholder from the transfer of shares that have been admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform.

For the purposes of the new rule, 'alternative trading platform' is a platform (as defined in Commission Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014) that is operated by the Malta Stock Exchange. In terms of the new rule, the capital gain is to be derived by the original shareholder of the shares, that is, the person who was a shareholder of the company before any of its shares were admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform and is not limited to instances where there was only a sole original shareholder. 'Original shareholder' is broadly defined to also include within scope:

  • The spouse, or direct descendant, or spouse of a direct descendant, of an original shareholder;

  • A trust or a company, partnership, foundation or other legal person whose beneficiaries are, to the extent of more than 50%, original shareholders or which trust, company, partnership foundation or other legal person is owned and controlled, whether directly or indirectly, to the extent of more than 50% by the original shareholders; or

  • A shareholder in a company who acquired his/her shares from an original shareholder by transmission causa mortis, that is, which devolved upon the demise of the original shareholder, or any other transfer to which the new rule did not apply.

In computing the capital gains derived by an original shareholder, the chargeable amount on which tax is to be calculated is to be computed as per the normal rules; generally the selling price of the said shares, less the cost of acquisition and relevant deductions. However, the chargeable amount is to be multiplied by varying percentages, dependent on the level of public participation in the company in which the shares are held. The level of public participation means the percentage of the equity shares in the said company held by persons who are not original shareholders at the particular end of the day on which the transfer in question is affected. Where the level of public participation is:

  • Less than 10%: 100% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 10% but less than 15%: 75% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 15% but less than 20%: 50% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 20% but less than 25%: 25% of the taxable portion; and

  • 25% or more: 0% of the taxable portion.

The new rule also adds that when a person who is not an original shareholder transfers shares in a company that have been admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform and the level of public participation in the company is at least 10%, no tax is to be chargeable on capital gains derived from that transfer. The rules are in line with recent announcements as well as legislative developments targeted at incentivising the domestic financial markets.

Salomone

vella.jpg

Mark Galea

Salomone

Donald Vella

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article