Hold on to your hats…

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hold on to your hats…

The new year has started with a question. While this question can be phrased in a number of ways, the common denominator is the topic: US tax reform.

Over the past weeks, in-house tax professionals have been telling me that this is set to change the tax structures of almost all multinationals, no matter what sector they're in.

For years, tax strategies have been geared around dealing with the US's outlying headline rate and system, but they will now need to be overhauled to suit the new reality – a reality which most of us are still working to understand.

But it's not only companies that have jumped into action; the 'race to the bottom' on corporate tax rates narrative will get plenty of airtime this year, with French President Emmanuel Macron mentioning it in his Davos speech, and across the Pacific from the US we've already seen China introduce retroactive incentives to keep companies on-side. But which of the world's superpowers has the more attractive tax system now? We explore this on page 18.

Beyond tax reform, companies also have to contend with the ever-growing appetite among politicians, the public and the media for greater transparency. We caught up with firebrand tax campaigner and politician Margaret Hodge, for an exclusive interview on page 25.

And while companies gear up, on the one hand, for the first release of country-by-country reports, and rapidly approaching implementation dates across a range of BEPS action points, on the other they must be looking into the future and preparing for the opportunities and difficulties that technology in taxation is already starting to bring (see page 28 on the complex world of taxation and robots).

There is also the taxation of the digital economy to take stock of. Italy has agreed plans for a unilateral measure targeting transactions – but is this really the right approach if, as BEPS Action 1 taught us, the digital economy is the economy?

Any one of these issues would, 10 years ago, have been enough to justify some complaints about a busy year ahead. With such a glut of risks and rewards, 2018 is set to be the busiest year so far. What an exciting time to become editor!

From myself and everyone at International Tax Review, the very best of luck for the year ahead. We'll be doing our best to guide you through it online, in print and at our events.

Joe Stanley-Smith

Editor, International Tax Review

joseph.stanley-smith@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
As Coca-Cola awaits a crucial 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision this year, its multibillion-dollar tax dispute could have profound implications for investors, cash flow, and corporate transparency
However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
Gift this article