Hold on to your hats…

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hold on to your hats…

The new year has started with a question. While this question can be phrased in a number of ways, the common denominator is the topic: US tax reform.

Over the past weeks, in-house tax professionals have been telling me that this is set to change the tax structures of almost all multinationals, no matter what sector they're in.

For years, tax strategies have been geared around dealing with the US's outlying headline rate and system, but they will now need to be overhauled to suit the new reality – a reality which most of us are still working to understand.

But it's not only companies that have jumped into action; the 'race to the bottom' on corporate tax rates narrative will get plenty of airtime this year, with French President Emmanuel Macron mentioning it in his Davos speech, and across the Pacific from the US we've already seen China introduce retroactive incentives to keep companies on-side. But which of the world's superpowers has the more attractive tax system now? We explore this on page 18.

Beyond tax reform, companies also have to contend with the ever-growing appetite among politicians, the public and the media for greater transparency. We caught up with firebrand tax campaigner and politician Margaret Hodge, for an exclusive interview on page 25.

And while companies gear up, on the one hand, for the first release of country-by-country reports, and rapidly approaching implementation dates across a range of BEPS action points, on the other they must be looking into the future and preparing for the opportunities and difficulties that technology in taxation is already starting to bring (see page 28 on the complex world of taxation and robots).

There is also the taxation of the digital economy to take stock of. Italy has agreed plans for a unilateral measure targeting transactions – but is this really the right approach if, as BEPS Action 1 taught us, the digital economy is the economy?

Any one of these issues would, 10 years ago, have been enough to justify some complaints about a busy year ahead. With such a glut of risks and rewards, 2018 is set to be the busiest year so far. What an exciting time to become editor!

From myself and everyone at International Tax Review, the very best of luck for the year ahead. We'll be doing our best to guide you through it online, in print and at our events.

Joe Stanley-Smith

Editor, International Tax Review

joseph.stanley-smith@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Gift this article