All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

New guidelines that allow for deducting equity incentive programme expenses in Swiss statutory accounting

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

The Federal Tax Administration has issued a new circular letter (number 37A), which confirms the existing practice of the majority of cantons for the deductibility of equity incentive expenses.

This move is expected to unify the approach of different cantonal tax administrations. This being said, some tax administrations do not agree with certain provisions of the circular letter, notably with the provision related to the deductibility of expenses for shares.

This update gives a short overview of different situations and the guidelines contained in the circular letter.

Own shares purchased by the employing entity

At purchase, the shares are booked as own shares in the statutory accounts at the acquisition price. When the shares are granted to employees the following applies:

  • The difference between the acquisition cost of the shares and the fair market value (FMV) at share delivery to the employee is considered a deductible expense or reportable income; and

  • If the shares are delivered to the employee at a reduced price, the difference between the FMV and the price paid by the employee is considered a deductible expense.

Share creation by the employer through capital increase

If new shares are created by means of a capital increase, such shares can be generated by booking the new shares against a liability for employee benefits. As a result, the difference between the FMV and the price paid per share by the employee will be accounted for as an expense, deductible in most cantons.

Despite the rules published in the circular letter, some tax administrations do not deem the expense as being deductible if the employee is not allowed to choose between the delivery of shares or a lump-sum cash payment.

Employee participation in the parent company

If the employee is not directly participating in the employing entity's capital but rather in the equity of the parent company, the following applies:

  • The difference between the price (at arm's length) paid for the shares by the employing entity to the parent company and the purchase price paid by the employee is a deductible expense at the level of the employing entity in the majority of cantons.

Accruals for share awards

If shares are subject to vesting periods (i.e. awards are granted that entitle the employee to receive shares if certain conditions are met at the end of the vesting period), the expenses incurred from such shares are typically accrued. The circular letter confirms the deductibility of such accruals.

Deloitte's view

It is recommended that companies check whether their existing accounting and recharge mechanism is in line with the rules as set out in the new circular letter. Depending on the specific equity incentive scheme, there might be additional room to optimise the way costs are allocated and deducted. We strongly recommend applying for a ruling with the competent cantonal tax authority, as some authorities do not agree with all of the provisions of the newly issued circular letter.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The companies have criticised proposals for the gig economy, while the UK and EU VAT gaps have fallen in percentage terms, and ITR speaks to a European Commission adviser about its VAT reforms.
Corporations risk creating administrative obstacles if the pillar two rule is implemented too soon, sources say.
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards 2023
The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.