All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Editorial

Welcome to International Tax Review's guide to intangible assets, published in association with Deloitte. In today's digital revolution, intangible assets are as central to the business function as steam-powered machines were during Industrial Revolution.

Despite the evolution of businesses since the 18th century, modern business is still governed by historic tax laws.

With the onset of the BEPS project, no sector or business is immune from the tax burdens of intangibles. New technologies and automation, a changing regulatory landscape, and the entry of new market players are reshaping the way we work. Businesses need to be strategic in the way they manage their intangibles and perform DEMPE functions in line with the BEPS Action Plan and the way governments are implementing and interpreting these measures.

It is unlikely that the BEPS project will clear up all the confusion over how to tax intangibles, but substantive guidelines and practical examples are offering some clarity.

However, analysing the most effective approach to dealing with the international taxation of intangibles remains a particularly challenging area.

In the case of transfer pricing, identifying and determining the value of intangible assets is difficult enough. Add to this a merger or acquisition and you have a host of additional matters to consider – the ownership structure of the intangible asset must be reconsidered, for example.

Brands are another complex area. One author in our guide writes that robust valuations and royalty opinions should incorporate analysis of the legal rights underpinning the brand, together with the associated reputational stock that drives purchase behaviour.

Despite increasingly harmonised international tax rules, complying with the tax rules for intangibles in one country will not guarantee your safety from audit in another. Already we are seeing judgments emerging on how tax authorities and the courts are determining the appropriate transfer pricing method for such assets.

Wading through the numerous laws and OECD guidance can be tough. It is through guides such as this one, that tax directors and tax practitioners can understand the wider issues of the debate, learn from case studies and examples and apply these arguments to their situations.

We hope you enjoy the guide and find the articles useful and informative.

Anjana Haines

Managing editor, International Tax Review

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.