European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: Public country-by-country reporting in the EU off the tracks, for now

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

During a debate at the European Parliament in mid-April 2018, a representative from the Council of the European Union confirmed to members of the European Parliament (MEPs) that there were "unresolved political issues" which prevented agreement at the council on the European Commission's April 2016 pending proposal for public country-by-country reporting (public CbCR). The two largest parties in the European Parliament, the EPP (Christian Democrats) and the S&D (Social Democrats), asked the council to unblock the negotiations on the proposal for public CbCR. This was generally understood to be the last chance to reach a deal as Austria, which holds the six-monthly rotating EU Council presidency from July 1 to December 31 2018, and could drive discussions in the council forward, is not in favour of the commission's proposal. Germany's new Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz said in June 2018 that the German government needed more time and he also counselled caution about the Commission's proposal and hinted at following a tax-centric approach instead.

Indeed, one of the thorniest political issues surrounding the Commission's protracted 2016 draft directive is its legal base, which has divided the EU's member states as well as the EU's institutions from the start. Both the legal services of the European Parliament and the European Commission have taken the formal view that there is no conflict in the Commission's choice of the legal basis for its proposal, since the draft public CbCR directive in their opinion is a tax transparency financial reporting tool, and not a fiscal matter as such, which would require unanimity voting in the Council (giving each of the EU-28 individual member states a right to veto the proposal). The Council's legal service however does not agree with its counterparts at the Parliament and the Commission.

Members of the European Parliament have expressed their discontent with the now prolonged impasse around public CbCR, arguing that some EU member states are using the legal basis issue as a pretext to delay any meaningful negotiations on this file.

EU Tax Commissioner Pierre Moscovici indicated in April 2018 that a deal would probably not be reached within the Juncker Commission's mandate which ends on October 31 2019.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article