International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg: VAT group regime sees light in Luxembourg

Sponsored by


On April 16 2018, the draft Bill introducing a VAT group regime in Luxembourg was made public.

On April 16 2018, the draft Bill introducing a VAT group regime in Luxembourg was made public. The law is expected to become effective on July 31 2018.

The main effect of a VAT group is that all supplies of goods or services between group members are treated as internal transactions and, thus, are not subject to VAT. The VAT group regime, therefore, is advantageous for taxpayers, such as asset managers, banks, insurance companies, management companies of funds, and so on, that are unable to fully recover the VAT on their costs. The regime is also beneficial for taxpayers performing services or industrial or trading activities that can fully recover VAT because they will no longer have to 'pre-pay' the recoverable VAT on transactions between group members. Other advantages include the ability to consolidate debts and receivables and reduced compliance requirements. Significantly, all group members will be jointly liable to the VAT authorities for the VAT due by the group.

Eligible persons

The regime will allow two or more persons established in Luxembourg, including individuals and legal persons, as well as Luxembourg branches of foreign companies to opt to be treated as a single taxpayer for Luxembourg VAT purposes. However, the persons must be closely connected by financial (i.e. 50% of the voting rights or de facto control), economic (similar or integrated activities or a common business purpose) and organisational (common de jure or de facto management) links. Passive holding companies may be members of a VAT group, which may be of interest to the numerous private equity, real estate and international holding structures established in Luxembourg. Persons that fall within the three categories of links may 'opt out' of group membership if they are not interposed in the economic flows between two members and if this does not lead to a VAT advantage for this person or the group.

VAT ID and filing of returns

The VAT group will be required to request a new VAT ID number and provide information to the tax authorities on the members, links, activities and organisation. The group's VAT number will be used for corresponding with the VAT authorities and filing VAT returns consolidating all transactions with third parties. Group members no longer will have to file separate VAT returns. VAT numbers that existed before the group was formed will remain active as 'auxiliary' VAT numbers of the group and will be used for relationships with third parties.


The introduction of a VAT group regime will be a major change to Luxembourg VAT law. Economic operators should consider this potential new opportunity, which must be viewed from various perspectives, i.e. members to be included or to opt out, the absence of VAT or pre-financing of VAT on transactions between group members, the volume of these transactions and pre-financing, accounting and IT changes, as well as the reduction in the number of VAT returns to be filed and payments.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.