Malta: New legislation introducing VAT grouping in Malta

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: New legislation introducing VAT grouping in Malta

intl-updates

New VAT legislation enacted in Malta introduces the possibility of VAT grouping for regulated financial services and gaming sectors.

The EU VAT Directive allows an option for member states to regard multiple taxable persons as one taxable person for the purpose of the VAT (VAT Group). In Malta, this option has been exercised to allow for entities licensed/recognised by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) or the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) to set up a VAT Group.

A key benefit of VAT grouping is that supplies between group members are disregarded for VAT purposes, thereby enabling operators to outsource internally, including, if that is an option, from foreign entities, (for example, an overseas head office) without incurring irrecoverable VAT.

Eligibility criteria

Two or more persons, established as legal entities in Malta for VAT purposes, are eligible to apply to the Commissioner for Revenue to form a new VAT Group and be registered as a single taxable person, subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions:

  • At least one of the applicants that are to form a VAT Group must be a taxable person licensed or recognised by the Malta Financial Services Authority or the Malta Gaming Authority in terms of applicable legislation; and

  • Applicants which intend to form a new VAT Group or applicants who want to join an existing VAT Group must be bound to each other by financial, economic and organisational links:

    1. Financial links are deemed to be present where the same person holds directly or indirectly more than 90% of any two or more of the following:

      • The voting rights (or equivalent interests) in the other person;

      • The entitlement to the profits of the other person, which are available for distribution; or

      • The entitlement to surplus assets available for distribution on a winding up or equivalent event.

    2. Economic links will be deemed to exist when: – the activities conducted by the persons who are to form a VAT Group are similar in nature or can be categorised within the same industry;

        • The activities carried out by one person are wholly or substantially for the benefit of any of the other (potential) group members; or

        • The activities conducted by the persons involved are interdependent or complementary.

    3. Organisational links are deemed to exist where the applicants have a shared management structure (whether in whole or in part).

Main implications of the VAT Group

Upon registration, the VAT Group in its entirety will be considered to be one taxable person for VAT purposes.

Within the VAT Group, charges relating to internal supplies of goods and services will generally be outside the scope of VAT legislation. This is especially favourable for those entities that provide exempt without credit supplies, leading to the possibility of having irrecoverable VAT costs. In addition, supplies provided by any person forming part of a VAT Group to other persons who do not form part of that group will be deemed to have been carried out by the group reporting entity, thereby having an effect on the input VAT recoverability position of the group reporting entity, and in turn, of the VAT Group in general.

The simplification of the compliance and administrative burdens of the taxable persons forming part of the VAT Group is also a welcome benefit of this regime.

Persons forming part of the VAT Group will be jointly and severally liable for the payment of VAT (including any related interest and administrative penalties) due and payable by the group reporting entity.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The ruling underscores the need for companies to provide robust and defensible valuations of intangible assets, one partner tells ITR
Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
Gift this article