International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Norway’s 2019 budget sees corporate income tax dip

Sponsored by

Chapter X has brought a number of guidelines to consider for Luxembourg

Norway's Parliament passed legislative changes for the 2019 budget on December 20 2018, seeing notable changes to inbound investments, particularly a reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate and stricter interest limitation rules (ILR).

Norway's Parliament passed legislative changes for the 2019 budget on December 20 2018, seeing notable changes to inbound investments, particularly a reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate and stricter interest limitation rules (ILR).

Corporate income tax falls to 22%

The general CIT rate for the income year 2019 has been reduced from 23% to 22%. It will largely benefit most Norwegian industries, except for the financial industry and the energy and resources industry. This will also affect deferred tax assets and/or liabilities in the annual accounts.

Stricter interest limitation rules

Inspired by BEPS Action 4 report, Norway has extended the ambit of ILR. For companies considered a "group company", the ILR will now apply to interest expenses on all debt, not just interest on internal loans. For stand-alone companies (all companies not considered as a "group company"), only the interest cost on related-party debt may be limited. Under ILR, net interest expenses exceeding 25% of tax earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) will be denied.

A group company is defined as a company that either:

  • Has been consolidated line-by-line in the outgoing balance of consolidated group accounts (prepared according to Norwegian generally accepted accounting principles (NGAAP) or general accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in an EU or European Economic Area state, US or Japan, or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or IFRS SME, in the accounting year before the income year); or

  • Would have been if IFRS had been applied (line-by-line consolidated).

  • For a group company, the rules only apply if the net interest expense for all Norwegian companies within the group (consolidated) exceed NOK 25 million ($2.9 million). For stand-alone companies, the corresponding threshold is NOK 5 million.

However, as a starting point, the ILR will not apply for a group company demonstrating that the equity ratio (after several adjustments have been made) of either the company itself or the Norwegian part of the group is equal to or better than the consolidated equity ratio in the group accounts that the company was consolidated into (in the accounting year before the income year), i.e. not thinly-capitalised compared to the overall group (a 2% deviation from the group's equity ratio is accepted).

Adjustments to the domestic definition of tax residency

Norway has adopted a new definition of "tax residency" in domestic law from January 1 2019, which could ultimately lead to a change in the tax residency status for Norwegian and foreign limited companies, among others.

Under the new legislation, companies incorporated under Norwegian corporate law will always be regarded as a tax resident in Norway, unless they are regarded as a tax resident in another country (based on their domestic law and the tie-breaker rule in a tax treaty with Norway).

Moreover, foreign-registered corporations that have their effective management (and control) in Norway will be considered a tax resident in Norway. Effective management (and control) is not limited to the decisions at the board level (which was the main focus under previous rule), but also the day-to-day management, where the directors of the board/management reside and have their daily work (and "other circumstances based on the company's organisation and business".) An example of "other circumstances" would be the place of the shareholder meetings.

The rule could lead to the challenging of the tax residency status for non-Norwegian companies owned by Norwegian groups, as well as Norwegian companies owned by foreign groups where management takes place outside Norway.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.