Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
The case has corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners outline the corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications of the Central Revenue’s decision.

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian permanent establishment (PE) to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). This is the conclusion reached by the Central Revenue, as an answer to the request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020.

Circumstances of the case

The case concerned an EU company (hereinafter ALFA) which intended to transfer its PE in Italy (hereinafter ALFA Italy PE) to the BETA company resident in another country of the EU, against of the issue of shares by BETA.

In particular, all active and passive assets of ALFA Italy PE were to flow entirely into a new PE, also in Italy, of the conferring subject, BETA.

Subsequently, the transferring company ALFA would carry out the distribution of profits in kind (corresponding to the investment in BETA, received against the aforementioned business contribution) in favour of its parent company GAMMA.

Accordingly, the Italian PE of ALFA would be transferred to BETA, and ALFA group will continue the activity in Italy, as well as in the other member states, where similar operations will be carried out.

Opinion of the Central Revenue

The Central Revenue expressed its opinion on the case considering the tax treatment in terms of corporate income tax (IRES), VAT and registration tax.

IRES

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian PE to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). However, if the shareholding acquired as a result of the contribution:

  • Is assigned to the ‘contributing’ PE and then transferred to its parent company; or

  • Is assigned directly (upon contribution) to the parent company; or

  • Is not functionally connected with the PE; or

  • the capital gain, if any, realised by the ‘contributing’ PE is taxable, possibly under the PEX regime if the conditions are met (Italian tax authority, answer to request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020).

VAT

From the point of view of the applicable VAT regime, the transfer of the business unit consisting of the assets and liabilities constituting the Italian PE of ALFA, in favour of the new PE in Italy of BETA, is excluded from the field of application of VAT, pursuant to Article 2, paragraph 3, letter (b), of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972.

In this regard, Article 19-bis2, paragraph 7, of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972 obliges the taxable person beneficiary of business contribution to rectify the VAT deduction, if the conditions are met.

Registration tax

For the purposes of registration tax, considering that the business contribution is excluded from the field of application of VAT, it must be subject to registration tax according to Article 2, paragraph 1, letter (d), of the Presidential Decree No. 131 of 1986 (TUR), by virtue of the principle of VAT-register, alternatively referred to in Article 40 of the TUR.

In regard to the extent of the registration tax to be applied, it is necessary to refer to Article 4, paragraph 1, letter (b) of the Tariff, Part I, of the TUR, which establishes the application of the registration tax in a fixed amount. 

 

Gian Luca Nieddu

Partner

E: gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it

Barbara Scampuddu

Partner

E: barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article