25 years of Swiss VAT: The partnership with the Principality of Liechtenstein

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

25 years of Swiss VAT: The partnership with the Principality of Liechtenstein

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
Liechtenstein has widely adopted the technical articles from Swiss VAT law

Tim Reck and Matthias Höhn of Deloitte outline obvious differences and commonalities between the VAT laws of Switzerland and its neighbour Liechtenstein.

Following the introduction of VAT in Switzerland 25 years ago, the Principality of Liechtenstein widely adopted the technical articles from Swiss VAT law into its own VAT legislation. In addition, a bilateral agreement details the cooperation between the VAT authorities of the two countries.

In the following article, the concurrences and discrepancies between the VAT law of Switzerland and Liechtenstein are explored.

Liechtenstein has adopted Articles 5 to 14 of the Swiss VAT law. Accordingly, the requirements for a mandatory VAT registration and the option to a voluntarily VAT registration are, in principle, the same. Furthermore, the principles of the place of supply rules for the supply of goods and services are identical.

Liechtenstein domiciled entities register for VAT with tax authorities in the Principality of Liechtenstein whereas Swiss domiciled entities register for VAT with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA). Foreign domiciled entities with supplies that lead to a VAT registration in the Swiss customs territory need to register with the SFTA. Based on this principle, a Swiss VAT registered entity may declare Liechtenstein turnover via its Swiss VAT returns.

While Switzerland maintains a publically available electronic register of entities with an UID (business identification number), in which it can be verified whether an entity is VAT registered with the SFTA, such a register is not in place in Liechtenstein. Hence, VAT numbers of Liechtenstein domiciled entities are not publically available online.

Contrary to Swiss VAT law, a Liechtenstein domiciled entity that only achieves turnover abroad is exempt from VAT liability.

Entities that are only VAT liable due to the acquisition of services need to register with the Liechtenstein VAT authorities and file an annual acquisition tax return on an official form provided by the authorities. In Switzerland, the declaration of acquisition tax is declared with a letter to the SFTA.

Cross-border VAT grouping between Swiss and Liechtenstein domiciled entities is not possible. Moreover, within the Swiss customs territory, the single entity principle applies. This means that branches in Switzerland are seen as part of the headquarters in Liechtenstein and vice versa.

While the Liechtenstein authorities have their own procedures regarding VAT audits and legal procedures, the Swiss Supreme Court is in charge for final decisions on the interpretation of the technical articles.

Overall, there is wide accordance, especially in the day-to-day business between Swiss and Liechtenstein VAT law. However, the fact that Liechtenstein is a sovereign state with its own law and institutions needs to be kept in mind, also for VAT purposes.



Tim Reck

Director 

E: treck@deloitte.ch



Matthias Höhn

Senior manager 

E: mhoehn@deloitte.ch



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article